1.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 12?" DAY OF AUGUST 2009"
PRESENT
THE HOEWBLE MR.P.D. DINAKARAN, cHIEH.£}'sT1tjE._ 3" A
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. 3USTI.CE v'."G,,1SABH.Ai¥éA;rTV':_A T'
WRIT PETITION NO. 686ig;;o%o9 {A LB_;P'i'L)
BETWEEN:
MARUTHI S/Q. KALLAPPA PATEL "
Age:56 , T'=. ; Vi; _T»j, "v'
occ: AGE-,IL.'. _ A
R/O *
AT ASTH.E'TA'!_UK A
BELc;'AuMg1 A "
SMT, MALAPRABHAW,/G BABU KAKATKAR
Age:42 . - "" "»"O
occ: AGVRTL, _
R/CA.SHIVA3,I GALL3'.
~ _ ..'j%1jAT,AsT%HE TALUK. .
BELIQAKJM-1
"~T'.'S.TH"F'2v.4i"."..SHVAAN:KAR s/0 VENKANNA LAD
Age:4Cf.'
T"~0c<:;':' ADRIL.
we 'SA-MBHAJI GALLI
, ATASTHE TALUK
_ 'i3ELGAUM~1
SHRI. BABU S/O LAXMAN LAD
Age:46
OCC: AGRIL.
to
12/0 SAMBHAJI GALLI
ATASTHETALUK
BELGAUM--1
5. SHRI. BASAVANTH S/O DUDDHAPPA LAD H' V
Age:55
OCC:AGRH"
R/O SAMBHAJI GALLI
KTASTHETALUK
BELGAUM~1
6. SHRI. PARASHRAM 5/o lIV)Uf§DHAP.i5A._LA-D:
Age:5O
OCC:AGRH" V., Ax"
R/O SAMBHAJI GALLI} ;
KTASTHETALUK _" 'p.
BELGAUM--1._ ,w-f='
7. LAXMA!\E_ _ , 4% "
s/0 KHE-RU»---L1§_._D " ..
oci: 'Asa-:uL3ijURE%.'
R/O SAMBH_AJI'G.Al..LI4.% . V
AT AsTHE_TALU:< E:5~E'L=.,Gfi\U_M._ "
SOMA_
Age:54"L
,*" '5./Q) }§i:a1R.U LAD %%%%%
OCC_'AGRIfCU_L;T_LJRE
HR/O sA_MV5H%A51_ GALLI
AT KSTHE:'TALUVK"BELGAUM
_ MAR'U--TH1_"
'\_u¥Ag€I58*
-. AS/0, LLAXMAN LAD
vocc AGRICULTURE
M -_R;.'_O"SAMBHA3I GALLI
.,. "AT;ASTHE TALUK BELGAUM
11.
" Ln ..
BHARAMTAT
' "Age: _ ' .
'(S/0 K.9T_LLAP'PA LAD
A? OCC AGRICULTURE
""-R/0__"K/ALAMESHWAR GALLI
SIDRAY
Age:5O
S/O LAXMAN CHOUGULE
OCC AGRICULTURE
R/O KALAMESHWAR GALLI
AT ASTHE TALUK BELGAUM
HARI
Age:36
S/O RAMACHAN DRA PATIL
OCC AGRI/MASON
R/O KALAMESHWAR GALLI,
AT ASTHE TALUK BELGAUM
BHAGIRATHI
Age:-42
s/0 NILAKANTH CHQi_.i»G'UL"r'§ L' x
OCC AG RICE'! LT-URE:
R/O KALAMESAT-iWAR.G:AL.LI '
AT ASTHE 'TA'l;tJ'K__ B%L--:.Lj:3AAuV_r_vaA'_ '
BABU"" 1. _ X 1-
Agiva-:60. _ _ ;
S/O_TIP_PAN!\EAfPATIL=._ " _
occ 'A_GF1ICUw!..TURE " "
R/O KALAt~1EsHwARar3ALL1
VAT' ASTHE-TALUK EELGAUM
ATVASTHE TALUK BELGAUM
;"aHARAMA
~Age:42
S/O KRISHNAPPA PATIL
OCC AGRIL/MASION
R/O MAHATMA GALLI
320.
4
AT ASTHE TALUK BELGAUM
16. LAXMAN
Age:60
S/O GAVADU PATIL
OCC AGRL/EX SERVICEMAN
R/O KALAMESHWAR GALLI
AT ASTHE TALUK BELGAUM
17. JYOTIBA
Age:48
S/O MARUTI PATIL
OCC AGRL/MASON
R/O MAHATMA GALLI
AT ASTHE TALUK aELgAu_«M"" gf
18. JYOTIBA ..
Age:35 V "
s/0 BHIMAN'N_A1'--PA'f_IL i
occ AG R_.L,{CAf_RPAI.N'TE
R/O MAiHA'mA"
AT ASTE~i1EVvVT'ALL|}u§"i3'E.l:CEA!,JM . --.'
SIBRAY % ._
Age:48 .
S/O MARUTHIPATIL
OCC AGRL/CARPAINTER
" R/_O KAEMESHWAR
¥.AT ASTHE TAL BELGAUM
KEXLVPAIEJA
. Agei36' "
S/o M}-"sRUTHE-.i'»*ATIL
% occ AGRICULTURE
" " " MTAHATMA GALLI
* .__/-KI" AVS'I'}-_!E TALUK BELGAUM
, -V%._fk;AL &.APPA
.._ /1\gei6{}
-, 1:';/0 KEBARIPATIL
OCC AGRICULTURE
R/O MAHATMA GALLI
AT ASTHE TALUK BELGAUM
22. KALLAPPA
Age:38
S/O BABU PATIL
OCC AGRICULTURE
R/O KALAMESHWAR GALLI
AT ASTHE TALUK BELGAUM
23. ARUN
Age:4O
S/O SHAWTU LAD Z
OCC AGRICULTURE-.._ _
R/O SAMBHAJI GALLI ' _
AT ASTHE TALUK BELGAiJIV1.. '
24. REVANI H , .,
Age:32::" 1 , ~
S/O KR1»SH»NA_PATIL. .. '
OCC AG RIcuLT;uRE--_
R/D M_A_HATMA'GALLI".___ _ _
AT "ASTHE TALUK B,EI;.¢3/R',_JM
25. NARAYAN
Age:6j;3" -, '
= .51/0 ..P}3.RAUSi-{RAM "PAT_T_L»
Oct; AGRICLJLTURE
'-~.R/Q 'MAHVATEVTAA GALL1
AT ASTHE§TAL!.JK~"BELGAUM
- ...PETITIONERS
A\(V$4\,'_ Sri vENKA'T'ES.?HA P DALWAI, ADV. FOR M/5 SHIVARAM
_ ;LAwT=1RM, AD'\.{s. )
" STATE OF KARNATAKA
-MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA
9
order was granted. A representation was aiso made to
the 3m respondent to stop construction of the road Viaindu
therefore, improvement work has been kept in
It is stated that the question of acquisition of.!~a–ndfjdoes notiy’
arise under NABARD scheme where: finanxcTve”‘iss
for improvement of viliage roadis-and pathwaysf’
no connecting road for S00 meteirspf the t)rir5i.uQé’:asvVaiieged
by the petitioner and –…_zviliagersi .i’.a~-repprressurizing the
respondents to c0mplete…th:’e:~.bridg.e as possibie.
Therefore, it .that:_the_:rwtrit”x’peti”tion is devoid of
merit and iiab–!.e
5. We haver’_hea:rtiii:he’r».lr4ea.rn-edhAddi. Govt. Advocate
who reiterated ‘the ‘»averm’e,nts:7made in the statement of
o”bj~e,
10
6. We have scrutinized the material on record and
considered the contentions of the learned Addl,.,,V’r'<3;ovVt.
Advocate.
7. It is clear from the scrutiny of t_he.,.A4rrratelr:iaI_
record that construction of the bridgejis”‘._un’cl’ertakentin,’
accordance with law after ,a’ccordin”g_ ‘administraltive and
technical approval to the propvosral’ subrni’tted’vto Chief
Engineer, C & B North,i.,D’harwad.,’,Afor vimprovemierat of road
and construction of bri_dg_e.s i,,Bei’g,a’u:Vrn..’–V”District under
NABARD schem4é£:::,vra’nd”:1tt¢§r””cal/pl’:n:Q’:–“for——t:?encier. It is seen
that conlstr.uc’tion’:’fact bridg-elf and development of
pathwatygis in’ theV:ia:rg»e’v_:’i’nt:eV;j’est of the public as it would
connect Astha and villages. The application of the
for gran.t…o’f temporary injunction in two suits
b,Ay»..,thevrn,:”as stated above, was rejected by the court
below’ and’.the’r’eafter they have made the representation to
fnthe 3”? respondent.
Having regard to the above said material on record,
we are satisfied that there is no merit in this writ petition
\?