Karnataka High Court
Shri Nazirahamed Kadirsahab … vs Smt Hafisabi W/O Mahammed Rasul … on 22 October, 2008
WPBQI 241.98
E
115 THE HIGH COURT OF' §{ARNA'i'A1-(A
cmcurr BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED '1'!-I18 THE 22" DAY 09 ocmnax,
BEFORE
THE HOIPBLE MR.JUS'1'IC$ n.v.sHYL_E1h:i3 1é2,a;' ..
WRIT PETITION No.30 1:§4g 2§¢QaUDAGA_R"~ .
AGE;60 YEARS, occ TRADE,
R/C) CTS NO 2040/A1/IF" -
KADOLKAR GALLI ; V.
BELGAUM. ' ' ._ f¢_Px";-'.TI'i'I01*lER
[By ' -
3:1;-3hasksa'_Faj*.i1, 'A_g_iv;i
m.<1;%
v 1 '5.s;sa?1* L1AF*1SA;Biv~~*--.I.I;'o MAHAMMED RASUL SOUDAGAR'
VA ' AGE;5 2'«YEfiRS, OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK
" 'O' 2524, KHATAL GALLI, BELGAUM
' SHRKMGHAMMED ERFAN
AGE 36_."x'EAR8,
'- S/.0 EVEOHAMMED RASUL SOUBAGAR
€}C<".'- BUSINESS
270 ms NO 2524, KHATAL GALLI BELGAUM
...4.-'sue: ERSHAI) AHMED
AGE 32 YEARS,
S/O MOHAMMED FEASUL SOUDAGAR
OCC BUSINESS R/O CTS NO 2524
KFEATAL GALLI BELGAUM
WP301 24.08
SHRI ISHAFAZ AHMED
AGE 30 YEARS,
s/0 MOHAMMED RASUL SGUDAGAR
occ BUSINESS . .
R,'O CTS NO 2524, KHATAL (}AL_Li, 3EL§3ALm:__' '
SHRI SARFAS .
AGE 24 YEARS, ' __ ,
3/0 MOHAMMED RASUL SQUDAGAR ._
occ BUSINESS ' «.
R/O (yrs NO 2524,
KHATAL GALLI
BELGAUM
SHRI NAZAREEN .1
AGE 37 ¥EA"f§S,' 2: A '
w/0 MUE~31Ri5I;_I--MED _Bii§}AI.__i{C;'I'1 V
006 i€fOU_SEVWIF'.E-. " _ .
R/O CPS I¥i'.}I;f.§3.52~<~. " A
1<H'A*'rm,V 't3ALLi§:.; BELGAUM.
si~;m'- zA§:1?A}§-» . " V
AGE 3? YE'.'~'.RS,._j .
W/OMOHAMMED 3331 MUJAWAR
occ H<3IJsEwm':=_
R/0 CRSKREAT HOUSE,
_ °~a9,ou.._:~m F'LOf3--F2~ =
«, RCQM no 1, ESALAMIYAN LANE
" <:;:3P~9ATEL._M1ss1oN BUIDLING,MAH1M
MIJM;3AI'T~.,»...~
sH:2i B§xé1A1sHR
" AGE 23 YEARS,
W / D ABDULALI BASAPURI
OCC HOUSEWIFE
A I KR/O c/0 M K BASAPURI 131,0'? NO 27
ZAWAHAR NAGAR, GGDIYAL RoAD,HUm,1
SHRI ENAYAT
AGE 33 YEARS,
SIC) MOHAMMAII3 HUSSAIN SOUDAGA§
OCC TRADE
R'/O CTS NO 2524 KHATAL GALLI
BELGAUM
WP3€¥} 24.08
4
petitioner and the irregularities pointec1;'_:""oi2:v:-'«.j: the
impugned order, I am not impressod to sAVr;1§itt€¢19V'~~
of this nature in supervisory juzisdiotioiz of as '~. -:
to disturb the order and to dopfiirae-._1':hsV fie)
plaintiffs to amend the £:o_ case ia a
comprehensive mmfiisi'. _ ' writ petition is
dismissed, I it court could have
awarded as a condition for
Ergwzsponse to this, learned
counsel for in this petition offers
to pay "of J
" .,s_ThisV"w;-itpetition is dismissed. The respondents
L}1¥§i*ei;1;’–.*o lsi1ai;§1’fs in the suit to abide by the submission
by is-armed oounsei and to deposit the costs before
‘gthe: to be permitted to be withdrawn by the
“:L:”dofsi}dant in the suit.
Sd/-3
Judge
Jrnf –