High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Shri Parmeshwar Pd.Yadav &Amp; … vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 29 November, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Shri Parmeshwar Pd.Yadav &Amp; … vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 29 November, 2010
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                       CWJC No.5826 of 2000
                   1. SHRI PARMESHWAR PD.YADAV , son of Sri
                   Bhuvneshwari Prasad Yadav, resident of Ward no.2, PO
                   & PS Madhepura, District Madhepura at present posted
                   as Senior Selection Grade Store Keeper, Eastern
                   Embankment Division, Birpur, Supaul
                   2. Shri Shiv Shankar Prasad Yadav
                   3. Shri Bindeshwar Sardar
                   4. Shri Padam Sundar Pradhan
                   5. Shri Randhir Kumar
                   6. Shri Bibhisan Prasad Yadav
                   7. Shri Surendra Shukla
                   8. Abul Bari
                   9. Shri Ravindra Kumar Sinha
                   10. Shri Ramprit Singh
                   11. Shri Niranjan Sisngh
                   12. Shri Arvind Kumar Singh
                   13. Suresh Prasad Singh ............            Petitioners
                                            Versus
                   1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                   2. The Secretary, Finance Department, Government of
                   Bihar, Patna
                   3. The Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department,
                   Government of Bihar, Patna
                   4. The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department,
                   Government of Bihar, Patna
                   5. The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Department,
                   Kosi Division No.1, Birpur, District Supaul
                   6. The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Kosi
                   Division, Irrigation Department, Birpur, District Supaul
                                            ..............         Respondents
                                               -----------

07- 29/11/2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The writ

petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the

order bearing memo no.474 dated 2.3.2000 (Annexure-1),

issued by the Government of Bihar in the Department of

Water Resources (Irrigation). The respondents have placed

on record their supplementary counter affidavit, paragraph –
2

5 of which is reproduced hereinbelow:

“5. That it is stated that Finance Department vide
its letter no.6316 dated 6.8.02 has issued a
circular addressed to Accountant General, Bihar,
Patna and communicated to the concerned
authorities that in view of the order passed in
LPA No. 1984 of 1995 (Ram Prasad versus The
State of Bihar) the order passed in CWJC No.
618 of 1990 shall not be only
confined/applicable to the petitioner of CWJC
No. 618 of 1990 but it shall be applicable to all
those persons who are equivalent/identical to the
writ petitioners of CWJC No. 618 of 1990. It has
been further observed in the said letter that those
store-keepers who are getting scale of Rs.260-
408 in pursuant to letter no.132 dated 17.1.80
will be provided the benefit of scale Rs.730-1080
with effect from 1.4.81, scale of Rs.1400-2300
with effect from 1.1.86 and scale of Rs.4500-
7000 with effect from 1.1.1996. This benefit
shall not be provided to those store-keepers who
have been appointed as Store-Keepers on 1.4.81
and 1.4.1981.”

It is thus evident as per the stand of the

respondent authorities that those of the Store Keepers who

were appointed before 1.4.1981 shall get the replacement

pay scales mentioned in the aforesaid paragraph of the

supplementary counter affidavit. The admitted position

between the parties is that all the petitioners were appointed

as Store Keepers on different dates between 29.12.1972 to

12.3.1973, as stated in paragraph-3 of the writ petition, i.e

much before 1.4.1981. All the petitioners are, therefore,
3

entitled to the replacement pay scales sanctioned by the

State Government.

2. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. The

impugned order dated 2.3.2000 (Annexure 1), stands Pro-

Tanto modified. Let the consequential benefits including

post-retirement benefits be made to the petitioners within a

period of four months from today, failing which the entire

dues shall carry interest @ 11% from the dates the amounts

became due till the dates of payment.

( S K Katriar )

( S P Singh )

mrl