Karnataka High Court
Shri.R.B.Muniyappa vs The Assistant Commissioner on 25 June, 2009
IN THE HIGH mum' 09 KARNATAKA, Bg;:§<§gA¥gQRE: T Q' I DATED THE 25TH my 0;i'j%{}1:j:eW:;:,'%.2<309j§%: V % BEFORE % L J THE HQNBLE MR. JUs'r;<:153 .:§L;»NARA'¥.:§s.N;'é'-:S§ETg%I§?IY wan' PE'rI1*1-smjNon"%§6i%3%;§}2oo9fLR)%% BETWEEN 1 * RN NA:sa;A« SHRI.R.B._MU§§IE*AP}?Ag SON C}F'__L--A'TEi'£3£;JJ()I§IS, 2 AGED A13_Qfj§;'_,. 55"YE.'_Al§§~S<' RESVIDINGEXT :2AMA.I§AHALL; VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPM'N5'§3,QBL1, DEVANAHALLJ '§"AL?Jf~£-- ' BANGALQFZE m;RAL*1::IsTmc'§. % PE'I'I'i'IC)NER REDSY : ADVOCATE) Am 1 *':::%i1:r: AS§:§?.'£'ANT CCJMMISSIGNER D€'3DI;)fA8ALLAPU§? SU3--I31v1sIQN, DODjD?ABALLA.PU'R, 3 ~ v1sHwEsHWARA:AH TOWERS, % '.B1§;NGALORE -- 5&0 001 MM 313121. R. SEENAPPA, AGE :MAJOI¥E, R/AT RAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALQRE RURAL QISTRIC?' RES?C3NI}EN'i'S (83; SR} RB SATYANARAYANA SINGH: A{)VOCA'I'E) "\ THIS WP FILED PRAYING TO DIRECT ;%':*~ CONSIDER THE: CASE OF THE PETITIONER FQR 13313333. ijpv FORM N010 in RESPECT OF mg ML;;:ar;:;.V BEAR;re<3 SY.NO.15/4, MEASURING :¢GU.N*3;'*A3 C}? T BALADIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE,=,_ 1-c§IANNARAYA.;P_Af?9za ' :--£oB:,1, DEVANHALLI TQ. IN FAVOUROF THE' ?:«:'§?r?I{?s1&i§: ':5 TERMS OF THE ORDER PASSED. BY T-H18 Hf_iN'}?ErLE c0U§:TL% IN WP.12?63/G'? 3:. DIsp0sE%V%%%.§¥f THE. A PENMNG BEFORE THE R1. M " a '2';-£13 PEFFPION CCMiflG 'V%F:§;2%%'V%1~:E;Am§§C}%THES DAY, mg COURT MADE THE FQLL-OW:E1§?G:" j[ _ % [4 %%imnER Geverigzgiexit "'i§"xiircct¢d to take notice for the r&sp0ndf;:m'$. 'prayer made by the petitionar is far issuing if3;vV':'res;}ect Gf 181161 bearing S37. N0. 15/4 V'.; . :::eafisui*i.;1§ gnrztas of Baladimmanahalli Viliage, ~ '{ji1 }3%13t:ara}?a£)attana Hobli, Devar;ahaI1i'I'a1uk. The petitjener 'p:~§f'Ahnexure»A Srtlbtliiis the Land Tribtinai has canferred T rights in his favour. Again the responflem: by "\ 1, 3 passing A1m€:x:Lm3-B f)}T"d€§' dated 12/ occupancy right as per AI1H€XUT6~;% ".:._§c§c.22;{1VVV"1'VheT 7. said order has been recalieé on 12 dated 10/04¢ 2098 this court sét'L'L»5;3:Siri«:' th6~.®d§jr figpféézxurewfi in LRT (ma) 205/1998»-9§'%~vand~{'%i~§s@;§§ien:s sz.%éfe"di:'ected 1:0 reconsider the mattgr in Grder passed in W? No. 12763 petitioner made representatior; jgsi ' V'A駧11€i' E dated £2 / ()8 / 2008 and 02/ not been ccmsidered so 3. 5' ~ in viiewhgif iihe 'diI:e:ctioI1 issued by this court in writ '§€ii'tiQfi :wéfér1féd:_. to above, them is a. duty cast upon the re:sLpQ1t1:iefit4:'tQ'»' appmpriate order as par the directions. Vviiance Vi'-.pa:$S' Eiiét follawing :~-- ORDER
petitien is aliawed.
4
The Iesponcients are ciimcted to pass
endear purmant to the order passe-,d {fin
withjxl a paiod of 4 months f1″1’1;1Tfi_1t: date: ‘Gf r€:c<éij;i;V §:of.'gy '<:;fV L?
this order.