Shri R Pavan S/O Shri. Ramesh Babu, vs The Divisional Manager on 23 September, 2011

0
21
Karnataka High Court
Shri R Pavan S/O Shri. Ramesh Babu, vs The Divisional Manager on 23 September, 2011
Author: N.K.Patil
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED '"I"'i"HS THE 23*" DAY OF SE13' T EZE\/EBIEIR, 2{)v'i"1. 

BEFORE

THE ]E10N'BLE MR. JUSTICE 1v'.K.P.s:.%1_:"I1,   "

MISCJCVL.1E5263 €f)F”2009 ‘ H .4
EN M.F.A.N0.6O87 0’1? 2.<:;09 jimvy j

Betxveen:


Shri. R.'£':;w21n
S,/0. Shri. Ramesh Babu.  _ 

.     _' V    Appeziiam

[By Shri. Shripad.\7.Sh£is?;ri,A }idv?§>{:e1t’e): AA

And: V V

The Divis’i033a::__E\{faaa.z1ger_, _
Ban.ga;u3t*€ .MQ1r0}5{§.] Star;

“I’rar1s:porE: Ci;Vt3:>0rat’§0114

* ‘ ~ R<3spo:'1den'L
{By Shfi V31. r;;u~::.«,,:;~_, }x:iféGcz1%',€}

This E\r'iiS':;;:–'Cv§. is fiied untiez" Secuen 5 ef the Ejgrzitatéem

;3~g!L:€'}. §.ra_yi1:'%_.g§ to céfiéibne 'aha', Cieiay ('if TFO éfayé-3 in .§fi.iim§ the
» Vz'.:E?a¢;:w 81§§}'{J1.'°{E1'§f-,. in 'me ir1te'r€s'§L Ofjiifiiiffi' and @qu§"i:y.

g "'£"§fé[:;'_:,=__ E{£.§§§::,C\;L Gaming 0:: far G:"d.ae1:'$. ibis dag}, the
Cgmri ;r.%:'s..a£'i§% Ehc £o§§<m*'E:1g;:

QRSETEQ

This EX/?E:is.;cx€%;,»-"is is; fiéeéi by the afmzzageéé Em' &ppe§1a';:3i,

" for condening the deiay of £78 days in fiéizig ihe appeal"

l\)

2. I have heard Iearned counsel appearing for

appeilant. auck iearned ctounael appearing for iI1SLi}’€:§'”.,

3. The delay in filing the appeal

satisfa(:t,oriEy expiained by showing; sufi’§_Qi§:f:1″t-.VV¢ai;§’s€§’ _& V’

the same is accepted. For ‘E.h{‘§ reaAS’o#;1;S_j

affidavit, accompanying t.hc,Tapp1ic«a£.jf)_n,

aiiowed. Delay of 170 fi1i§.’};g: t:}£:€ ‘appeal is
condoned, V ‘ ‘ V H H

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here