High Court Karnataka High Court

Shri Rajashekara vs Shri Byrappa on 9 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Shri Rajashekara vs Shri Byrappa on 9 December, 2009
Author: H.G.Ramesh


4. -f.~i*§-ER3Z E’%”E32EiP§’;§ V

1:5 @323 mm: covm ms’ KAMATAKA AT 3A1aiG5.i.am;”‘—–.T

DATED THIS ‘THE 9TH ms? or nzcgmsrsn 2

EEFGRE

THE I+iGR’BLE ¥9¥RJ38TiCE x-V§<.G.mm:%§sI7i" f

fiET'§EEE€:

3:422; §%fi;Jé\.SE~£E3§Ai%A
sja”; $z%§NANANJA£AH

AGE: §§.E:?s€”)U’i’ 36 YEARS _
zmamwaxgag vzmmg ~
msazsg E-EGSLE, ‘I*:;§euxz:«::{ERE–*%:>\A:;U£<;–.A '
TEEMKUE ::):s'm:C':*_.–_ V
REPRESENT BY HES \%z'§[E%3:: . '
§'%'AGAR§;TH?aNA1§iMA,__ <3..p.';:s.x ;§.<:,":g.:;–§+";}"e g »
5?? :22'? 1 » — "'.¢Apx=ELLAzvz'r

{8':' SR! AN;;§AN;«:¥.é ,'

$3333:

S;’°%C} AJgm.P;%a.

‘mg: :’%§3C>:¥f’i’ 4:»;rg;e:ARs

E{£LL}s z§A’:{E:”::g’ 1fILLfi?;CéE
§<;AS:x.._Ezx_ H{}E£§;i~,,_TL§§f€i§§?EKEE€§§ '§"£Li}'EsZ

, ":m.ai§2:>a – .;:’:?’2- ‘2’ ..,R.E$?ON$£I*€T

” 1 ‘ :§3§”~ 31%: S.E§;.i§»§A”£§ z£D”£€}{§£§§’E.§

»iz’:~§:”::s KS3 is § ‘?,2€3€i6

“–, “”E’ASSED EN if’).S.i’*€::2fi}’4;’2§$1 SN THE F’§LE; ff?’ ‘§’E'{E CEVEL
‘ JUEGE {..§§¢§)N.§ 8s«.iE%§.§4″C, TL§§€U’JE3KE3i’§3E.

Rwuiar semnci mm: n»zo§%1_,3:?£§: (T 2b€§§%%%.A

R. S.A.N9. 2.3?é§2€}’98

“i’§~§ES IRFFEAL {3f;’}M§§\ICzi ON WEE HE2?.E€fI’i’é(} {)N 1.13;. T’§€§iS
i3*AY, ‘§’§£§Z COUPE’ DELEVEREB ‘THEE F'{}i.e§J€jWlN'{§:

gvmamxxw

£-i€a,1′{i. Tkzis is a deiiendafifys Sfififiild.-A4″gfip§)Sé§; H

‘i”here is a deiray of seven months ;’3.4:ia§’s}

the appeal £’.A.£/ 2f}(}8 is {fled for : <:p:i::?_ifiii':1;a.i£i€::ji;' :

fie}:-gay. I have perusezi the a:£1":i€i:§:ik1?i; fljiéiii 'G3;

{.116 appiicatjon. in 11135' apiI1ion,v.Vfi3€: _$aiis_e siizjwia is not
sufficient to C()1£1d£3I1€ the 'ixésjréiizlffitgs {if€}33:éf7 :2 15:3 (iays

in fiiin ' the a ;¥-iewiévvaifi'%:r1.4t§1%:'-intefstst cf' 'ustice,

I have €X£32Ifi'i(3'1i'§fZ§¥.:1f§L§}{¢3.':I§}§i4¥:fE:3§f"QI1 2iié'fi%$. Thfi trig; €;:<mr1?i
has dseméd €116 Vszgitiéjf._:is$po:1::£m1t—p£ai:1:;§:i' fiied fer

gféfili of;:.~€:'11i;:23";éz}§'iI3_?At::i%:%_iA;;z;*;m’;,3._:*_f;*a:;i191*,§ in this second appaai’ Na greumfi is

thfi aypaai. [5iC€Gf'{Yfi11gi}¥, £wfi;.I/2398 flied £51”

3A?/

EgS,&.§\i;mQ.2E?’§g”2fi§8

sandonafian 3f lths cieiajgz in fiiing the appeai

appeal Sfaflti dismissed.

Appeal dismiisseci.

Sh}/«Ara