IMPUGNED ORDER/INTIMATION A’? A;+~m1é?;;;:i;;L’f~:;’a:§§’;”_2.
susmcrr N0.1, RESOLUHON No.1, m*rE1:}. ’14gA:5;/”29o3
PASSED BYTHE R-2. 4 ,
THIS WLP. comma cm F012″i5iét:’LimNA-R*{.:}iE:A1§’I&(:§’]
THIS BAY, THE COURT MADE THE. mjL{Low[iN<3:_.
«_.I?=i>.w.m
Mr. Mallikazjunv thA.2itV’h£:fVVvhas been
instructed to enter app;:’aVAI’a_ r:’ i1szrit’V_’1:)etiti011. He is
permitted to
ES’ to take notice for
mspafidcnt N0.’ -.
V. Evéniizbugfi. the matter is listed for preliminary
‘V ihearm. A’c«;>r1sent it is taken up for final disposal, in as
219; petitions are covered by nziing of this
R0. 31098 of 2008 disposed of an 18.242009.
ifhc masonings Sfaittd therein this Writ petition 8130
A disposed 0f permitting the pefitiemer to put up the
_,¢r};3.s1Iuction. within a pezritxi of six mmaths from the date of
cammunieation of the sanction plan. If the said exercise is 2%
r
t’
o
not completed within a period of nine ;;:;i5nthsf 7
onderj notice impugned in this Wfit §ct_:itien. :: fir u
fozftzitum shail stand revived atifiomafiéafiy H: ‘Eht=L,_’ ‘site;
would be forfeited by £216 £\P¥:’t§{:’_.’ Pefifififi ;
accordingly.
4. Smt. Vidyavaiii fiir: memo of
appearance ”
. ._ ”
Image
%%%%%