High Court Karnataka High Court

Shri Suvendu Sinha vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Shri Suvendu Sinha vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 March, 2008
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
IN THE HIGH coum' or KARMA-'l'AKA ATBAN<3.A1}¢j2é:kk«%Lk: % 
DATED mus THE 12TH DAY or MARCH,  I     " ' A'

BEFORE 

THE HOPPBLE MR. JUST .3 A. :?i'n1€-t_i.:  

WEI'? PE'!'!'!'!0!\! Ne.-

B%':"'v'v'i:."'E'.I'€

Sri Suvcndu Sinha,

s/o Jitendm Nath Sinha,
Aged 20 years, stud¢:nt,._ _ * _  ' 
Vive1:a,m_a;1¢_1g CoLlI':_.gr;=  " ,  

.:__:__,J.

Rajajinasarll

1. Thu: Stntekzf
!27gf;_I1t2i3::1I.ted.”‘L=yVi.ta 1′.~’;-.::::mt.¢.-..fj-,r,

001.

bf -E1’camining.Authoxity,
Govamment College ef=Pharmaey; _
.. n 3’5 mm, Subbiah circle,

I-VQOVJ wt-it I

I 0 ‘

0| 1-go-anon

‘ ;Th6 rn.:’.u.n.’1

Vivekananda Colclge offlxarmacy,
‘Dr.Rajai:umar-Roati,.
Rajajinagar II Stage,
Bangalore – 560 055.

4. The Secretary.

The West Bang’ ai Council” of

Higher Educatbn,
who Bhavan,
§.i1:x;al;1 agate, : ‘
North East Block.

Em}; Salt Lek,

Kolkatta 700064.

5. The Regisuur-cum-Becretasy.
Pharmacy Council oflmjia. *
Combined Councils’-Buitflinagfi. ”
Kotla Road, Aiwan–E–Ghaiih, 0 ‘
New Delhi 119002..

. . . ncuyuznnuuua

{By Sri ‘fof’E§- 1 ‘ ‘ es.-.a for R-5′)

Thisewr;t;v.;:a:so.;o amt.-§£Auic1esr -226 and 227 of the-

Consfitution ozflndia direct the respondents» to receive
the eymminaiion fee’ Vth;e..peti1″;ioner and permit him-to take up
tlze e.Irn____mina*.ioo._ !i:!3.Lo1a_a.r:: ;n:et”_:t:.\ mm: and

publish the xesliitaaiw’-otlicré and etc. _

Etition coming on for preiiminaly hearing ‘B’
made the fbllowing:

0 00 the matter is listed -for p1\elimh1a1y-hearing-in ‘3’

4j;;o1’q$,”‘i’*iiave taken it up for final-disposal with the consent of the

counsel for the -petitioner. respondent Nos. 10. 2 and 5.

flI:?H

2. The factsofthc case that the

out the West Bengal Council of Higher

vocational-stmam in-2006 and joined t?;iéA>I3’P’1armah_v – L % 1

,”-ltd 1-1:-unnnflnnt (‘tuna-an fnr {Hp I:l’£IlIl’F ‘ ‘5’ I K ~~

…4.:4:-.__..,p_ -.1_.:_-:-M ¢_74.1..-
pcI.ll.1UuI:13I:Iu1u1a -u to I11

2″‘ n:sponcient,- he got tn for _
examination. Agitating-his um. _

petitioner .4

ti 4-«A2 -9,,-€.., _,=:’ ‘ nu; ..”l;– __:__ V; _,_._ A A .4.-A _._4m A .M _¢2’_Q_ ._ AL ..
:3. 31’]. ‘;if”!EII)i’3’.l7B ‘COIIH.SCI”IUF”EHC”wIIIK)I!6T'<.

submits iVIa11ious- sum =of7=Ra~.»60-;] -.2 _A
to the -3" '~f§r4admiasi¢)n–1D"thc' -. _
The l%i'a:a_ oomc fiumvwest–Bengal-only _

I-'i'iiiS–.l) "" "ii1'fi€ht~eamcst'.'–he"ia Ploaeeufing

my notice, the interim :o1du:r,==dt-. 13.07.2607-

-the apgiearfor

_ . »_ g_ Ha ,~ %

–nuns:-um’I-A-I’ «nu duds’ uv–fi- ,.l’uxu|oLI’I–nJ|Qaa

‘ . u:.._ ._ _ 7¢:3-_.:, .u………
‘_’JnR!5l..I_’.IV.I.I.l§Efl’-“Il- Illa IEIIIIB E-IC -II-Ill J53» i ‘ KJII ‘.I.’lCl’I.KII”=’.

4. The 3″‘ -respondent -College «though -.:._

unrepmacnted. ‘

5. Sri B.-~Manohan~- the «

respondent submit that -‘ {local -enuy:.;_.%_:

qualification for _

Regulation» of

Bipiae-ma-“uu~a:’-we P”? – – — %

*5. €..-A-~..’r.,,-“.’:-..-:–.:.-vi-‘.’.-ea; _

mm A .4 in arms. ,%
fofloiazing’ mm: L
in-Sc’:i’efiae;-A % I

I. M7 %
ALIS) Any other

AI__ _.L__ .. _._.___;__.4_’_____

Gftraeunavs %

4.
1
.’ V’ xi

6. Sri- Havcri finther to
mapondent has-[already sent the communication;

HRH.

[Annexure-R-II] to the 3″‘ respondent .
Stream of West Bengal -is -not approval
_-___-,_t t_ -Council –of India -[_P;.C.I)- V’/gfb. T.

regt:’.a~t-*-L.r.’-t of Eel-use-.*i..en~ _

E PI______ r\,_–._… …. 4. …..-…-. ,3.’ ‘III.-‘ml-. figcuvh U

nanna Uourac/nu the pun lli’:\'{tFbW.’ pug. w ..

Seoondafl “Education in of

direction’ to

contrary to _. A

.,tn¢f ciona.a5.nt;toir the apex mm

P. C.I. empowera- _A

P!r.a.t*rn….__nn_\,r ‘any: ~omm- :

: mi ‘

.~:=
I
I0

“hr!–an-.

n.>.q

19″‘-A’11Y«’?1′

‘t As Gout-saint question’ is not by
r.: M V

” — ‘ —+- 4- — ‘
11111 H l..I.I.|’.i IIGIJIHJIICAI ¢l.’.I.lo ‘IuI.|1x.I:n.ras.n uauvvuvvn 1!’. _

9-T ’12- 4~-as :t.,n.s.iv-_=;L~.9.t-. __

8. I direct the 5*” respondent Pharmeyn-Vto.

take into account the structume- n-and V-course

Vocational Course -in -question -and I .;:.

the Vocational e- Course in-=-=queation=

enumerated pn:-entry –

‘4.

IIIII-I

-.__.. ;1_.;’;..;;;.s.__ __ n..- .__._..:..__1_.___ _

—- \ -I—–4- s– ——- ———–V-5:4′; –Q-1|–5%-V. . 1′.
rc punu I. w pt-ma &pp1UpIlH.uD_fiJll2§?IE5 – oh.

mfiwner is at st.-.n.k:.-, !’ ale-9. _

the -Vocaiionai in – of 2 7

months fivom oopyon of today?s..,_.

order. lfvthe ‘-«and-‘-hofla _

__ T

petitioner to from ll oil

course.»
by _

er-‘–holding—-that nu.-.4

the–Regulations-, ‘ ,

in -t.|.t.e’-a.I.:I_o1;nts.Iong.Ie-_’Id.- by h’i___m*f.o

-6:-‘-u.nn.n-n’nIi-I-nu , ‘

-er-V’..’i1.”……e m|…u..4.1…. .4a.:.,….. 1…… .4 1…; .._:.1

‘ _ .. __ _ _n. ;n
3:-1|-!l.E’I5u tutu. tn puutnulcl nun at -l:£I.’1&lI’.r’lKE.”I-U;.Ul.JI:l[ “, Uuxuun.=…_

ciispufieti-with—any rate of success;

RU

WW5?’I’l.

produced to prove their-payment. The copies-« of

Annexure-F and G. The learned _

paid another -Rs.-20.000[– in respect of-which dd

If the 59*” respondent passes

entty quafificaticg, tfie .31″ a !.-;r..-:–;. _

0*’ ..s.40,9’J0,’- tn the “‘- ” “”‘

1 ‘u’% 1

fircm the dtifié cf -d’ai.Ie__ci”

month from the esti-

Iespondent. ____

refund ofdamages *-by a _

constituted xi

that if the 5″‘ respondent passes an.

the mat1aer~and- .

V Vocetficnal question -is equivalent to _

entry the 3’4 reapoenient is-not liable and the

‘ icdilotecntitlcd to receive Rs.40,000~_I-.

RBH

11. In the event of the 5″‘ respondent’ _
Courses am not equivalent, -the

return all the originals-to the pctitioncr.j_””‘ . A_

12. This petition -is allowed mgitlae 7 ‘ mg!’

older as to costs.

bvr