High Court Karnataka High Court

Shri Veeranna G Chicknaragund vs State Of Karnataka on 2 March, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Shri Veeranna G Chicknaragund vs State Of Karnataka on 2 March, 2010
Author: Ram Mohan H.Billappa
_I_

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, 

DATED THIS THE o2Nv DAY OF  

PRESENT  ¢

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE  
I-ION'BLE MR. JEISTICE  BILLAP_PA~~~ 

WRIT PETITION mo-; 192.05%. or zooeafczs)
BETWEEN  Z 'V  V' .%

Shri. Veerarm-at G, Chicknaragtmd.

S/0 GangappaEflllickhiaragurld.._   
Aged abcnit i}«4'ye:§,rsV.    '
#69/3, 3:-s{ i\r1ai;n Rc$a'd._.V  '_  

Muf;iran1a.1Vi"n5a --}3_ibk'.'   v
Ganganagar,   "

Bangalore D» 560 032  ..PET1T1ONER

',5 M

'S31. YDNL"  Adv.)

Y


..Il>

 .  -   0.i%"Karnataka

Represented by its
,_"C';1ief Secretary.
,. "Vidhana Soudha.
 Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi.
Bangalore -~ 560 001.

  {a} Karnataka State Judicial Dept. Empioyees'

House Buiiding Co~(>p. Society Ltd.
Now at Judieiai Layout at Jakkur.
Yeiahanka.

Bangalore

Represented by its SecrreI;.ary.€

:54



And also

(bl No.7/2, Surya Chambers.
15' Main Road.   -
Seshadripuram, l
Bangalore M 560 020.

3. The Registrar of Co-operative  V
Societies. No. l . Ali Askar Road.
{Karnataka State), V   "  
Bangalore M 5e'o~~o_01._«" _ '   _  ..RESPONDEN'l'S

(By Sri. M. Si':/appa &"'A'ssoCiate'a_,_ 3~.d.vs:' iii} R2 and
Sri. R. DeVdas',««;A"GA {or  &=R.'3}_"-- .. 

This \liJ:rst"i>e.i,it1(3~nj.-.1:5'iisiecl zinider Articles 226 and 227
of thep__VCon.st'ilti:itionof' India praying to call for the entire
recordsllrelating alllthe ailotfnent made so far in regard to
vario_us._types,--o.f"me'1Ay,"RAM MOHAN REZDDY. J.. MADE THE FOLLOWING:

0 R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges
receipt of a Crossecl cheque for P352, i0,000/- dated 243"

2010 drawn in favour of the petitiorier and issued by the

lei



respondent -- Karnataka State Judicial Department

Employees’ House Buiiding Co–operative ‘r’»:.S0ciety

Limited, being the amount in deposit

for aliotment of a site and submits th.atV_A4_jt~he’gjeiiiiiorier

does not press the petition.

2. Recording theV’isLi_Vbmis’s_io11.V WV:r’i’i.«:’vp_etii.3ion

accordingly dismissed as pressed} isrnade clear”

that this order is s1i’o}ec.tro reiaiissiioii of cheque.

Sd/-

JUDGE

ooooo W sd/-

JUDGE