1N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DPIARWAD
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY or DECEMBER;dCC2'C§i*.§?"' =
BEFORE u
THE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1er«;
WRIT PETITION No.6sa23/zéiifi
Between: H C
Shrishaii, , '
S/o.Shanka1" Tottagi,
Age: 20 Years, Oeet.-Stiiderit, V
R/O Mahalingpurj _ V _ '
Tq; Mudol , Dist? B_a,gailiQt.Q;-.__ ...PETITIONER
[By Sri.AnaiidVQVR;KoV1Ii,'A C
And: C A K C it
N W K s E: T C sagaiizét {dixrision}
Bagalkot "
I-'RepreAser1ted'" by"i.ts CCCC H C
...RESpONDENT
**=i=**
This \a+"1*itVCf;=eCtition is fiied under Articles 226 and 227 of
the Cons'iiti1tion of India, praying to quash the impugned
"'-C.o"rde'rn dated.:O6.04.2010, Vide AnneXure--D passed by the
.'VV.resj:30ndeij1t corporation. Grant interim order, directing the
resporiderit Corporation to provide any alternative job as
C' fxwhichg is suitable to the qualification the petitioner to meet
it ends ofjustiee.
L/.
IQ
This petition Coming on for preliminary hearing this
day, the Court made the following: '
ORDER
in this writ petition under Articles Of .0
Constitution of india, the petitioner:=1has:.0eaiiepdhitnt
the endorsement dated 6.4.2010’v-ide T V
2. By the impugned end0oVi*se1nent,V” petitioner has
been informed that there eornpassionate
appointment as died after he
was removed from’; petition.
3. in ‘0
The petiti.oner’s _father”‘_.Was a driver. He was working
t’.1’1d€I’ the “respondent. due to his illness, the petitioner’s
fa’ther1″was.V_v i*iot..rab_le to attend for duty. Therefore, the
vvpetitioneris removed from service on 80.03.2009 as
Thereafter, the petitioner’s father has died
on’~:0f2fi”iV.08…é2009. The petitioner has given representation as
per }%,11nexure«’C’ for compassionate appointment. The
V
‘.;.)
respondent has issued endorsement as per Annexure–‘D’.
Therefore. this writ petition.
4. The learned counsel for the petitionerifeidfeoiitentied’
that the impugned endorsement cannot be .1as,>v.”‘
He also submitted that the petitioners”father_f died”‘di:\§’w.:.:£Q
illness and therefore, the petiticine-rpphasgiven
and therefore, the impugned ____f:endorVsernei1«t__cannot be
sustained in law.
5. I have gearefrillyii._consi:de’red~–.th.e…submissions made
by the 1earne’d’vfC’oiu.ijsei’ffoi’ ‘_’petit.iorier.
6. It iS.__reEevant’.tonote, the petitioner’s father was
working a’~driver”.=.I€_Ie has been removed from service on
..as.pp.ervAnnexure~’A’. Thereafter, the petitioners
(§,%iid’f25.os.2oio. The petitioner has given
‘7’,_representatuiori as per Annex-urew’C’ for compassionate
.1 élpptiiininientidd The respondent has issued endorsement as per
stating that the petitioners father has died
ll//.
after he was removed from service and therefore, the request
of the petitioner Cannot: be considered as there”‘–»is.Vj'”‘n’o
provision. I do not find any error or illegality in
endorsement. Therefore, the impugned”‘enriorserneintdoesynot
call for interference. There is no rnerit this” writ «.pet’itio11._
and therefore, it is liable to be dis’2n:i’sVsed. it ‘
Accordingly, the Writ ‘i3§?titiOn”‘i:5. n€§iisVVi*1*1.i$’%ec«l’.”‘*-A
–=
Mck/–