Shyam Yadav & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 22 November, 2011

0
31
Patna High Court – Orders
Shyam Yadav & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 22 November, 2011
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Criminal Miscellaneous No.33032 of 2011
                  1. Shyam Yadav
                  2. Sushil Yadav, Both sons of Buchai Yadav R/O Village - Tardih, P.S.
                  Sakatpur, District - Darbhanga.
                                                                              ---------- Petitioners.
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar                                      ------Opposite Party
                                                     ********

With
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33038 of 2011

1. Ranjit Yadav S/O Bikau Yadav

2. Rajendra Yadav S/O Bhallu Yadav

3. Rajendra Yadav @ Gudar Yadav, son of Choudharyjee Yadav.
All resident of village – Tardih, P.S. Sakatpur, District – Darbhanga.

———- Petitioner.

Versus
The State of Bihar ——-Opposite Party
********

4. 22.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Earlier vide order dated 21.11.2011, Cr.

Misc. No. 33032/2011 and Cr. Misc. No. 33038/2011

were disposed of as withdrawn with respect to

petitioner no. 1 namely Shyam Yadav, son of Buchai

Yadav, and Petitioner no. 2 namely, Rajendra Yadav,

son of Ballu Yadav.

Remaining three petitioners, apprehending

their arrest in connection with Sakatpur P.S. Case No.

53/2011 for offences under Sections

147/148/149/341/323/324/326/307/452/379/504 of the

Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case with
allegation of arriving at the house of the informant and

in retaliation of political rivalry on failure to succeed in

getting hold of the informant assaulted his wife. The

petitioners except Sushil Yadav, carry general and

omnibus allegation.

Submission is that Sushil Yadav though

carries specific allegation stabbing informant’s wife by

a dagger, but post mortem report does not support such

assertions. Further, at no point of time the statement o

deceased was ever recorded. Though, she is said to be

alive for several days during treatment before death.

Specific allegation of assault appears against one

Shyam Yadav, whose prayer has already been

withdrawn after being apprehended. Further, none of

the petitioners have any criminal antecedent.

If, it is so, considering the facts and

circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or

surrender within a period of four weeks, let the

petitioners namely, Sushil Yadav, Ranjit Yadav and

Rajendra Yadav @ Gudar Yadav, be enlarged on bail

on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

thousand only) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Sakatpur

P.S. Case No. 53/2011, subject to condition under

section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and

additional condition to attend the court regularly till

disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two

consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation,

the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled.

Rajeev/-                       ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)
 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here