High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Shyama Kant Shukla vs State Of Bihar on 26 November, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Shyama Kant Shukla vs State Of Bihar on 26 November, 2010
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                          Cr.Misc. No.39495 of 2010
             SHYAMA KANT SHUKLA, son of late Rampadarath Shukla
                                    Versus
                              STATE OF BIHAR
                                   -----------

2/- 26.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 447, 326, 324, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal

Code.

Considering that for misuse of privilege for bail about five

years the petitioner has remained in custody since 17.08.2010 and he

undertakes to be more vigilant in future, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-

(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other

surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of

Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.5, East Champaran at Motihari

in Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 33 of 1989 ( Session Trial No. 294 of

1992), subject to the conditions, (i)That one of the bailors will be a

close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other

bailor will be cousin bahnoi of the petitioner, namely, Mani Bhushan

Pandey. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court

about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii)That the affidavit

shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case

and if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii)That the bailor shall

also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his
2

release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground

of misuse, (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date

and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable

to be cancelled.

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and

conclude it positively within a period of nine months since the matter

is of the year 1989.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
Ashwini/-