Siddahanumappa vs The Executive Director on 19 July, 2011

EN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA A’? 4%

DATED THIS mg 191% I3A.i..¥~:::

BEFQREI’-. % L” A’
THE HONBLE EViR.JUS’fi§.§”~ANA}€B
WRIT PETEFEQN No’;’2;:5:_E}4f% C2″«*2G1AiA{5:§”*

BEE} WEIEN:

AGED 58 > .

S/O LATE 1\rIIjDE;APPA”‘ ‘

WORKZENGV A$ivfADEi?i£?»F{S».V:RA’fIi?*E :i>FF1cER,
C E/ENGCEHCV B N0. % ”

ROAD V’

V’ BAN-GAJLQRE ‘ ‘ HHPETITIONER

.gB’\;.Sr*~:;¥fj”:.’::%i JA€;;z%iD1sH 3: R NAGABHUSHANA –~ ADV)

“§H§:”EXEcU1’1VE: DIRECTOR

~ «EDN 85 ESE}? BHARATH BEAEY
V’ IELECTRICALS LTD

ELECTRONICS DIVTSIQN,

P B NO.2806.,

;\fIYSOREI RQAD,

BANGALORE 558326

M

THE *’§}EE’*%JE§’£{f3:L Z¥’Z5%?§’AGER,5 HE’:
E §i€§3fY ELEC'”§EI€ff%.LS Lf§’B.§
€§,gEC?RECiALS §}E’J§S§Q?\§ ,

F 3 §’2?€%§2§{}{*§§ V?%.<'§'r'SC%RE2 R§.',"}.i%E}g

Z