IN THE HIGH coum' OF KARNATAKA c1Rc:I,§a*:*.'1e.;$§§€i:i1_:"'
AT GU LBARGA
DATED THIS THE 1213* may J
PRESENT _ A T A %
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
A"? j
THE HONBLE MR. JUSl'I(5£: E.'
L
BETWEEN: _ %L
Siddamma _ .... '
W/o .
Age: 56 yea1's,,_0cc: Agrsw1tuze%;%%T. %
R/0 Kale Layout, Shah
Gflbarga. APPELLANT
_;j' '' (BY SR1' XEEERESH B. PATIL AND
- _ manna P;"E{'£i'LKAR¥*iI, ADVOCATES}
r:aao:@:gsmn% cc Co.Ltd.,
Dr. 5.-'aoiraplex,
I Super Mazkct,
"'£)ist. swarm RESPONDENT
(av sm 9.3. mm, AIJVOGATE)
_fl_’§~ils M.F’.A. IS FILED U/S 173(1) 0;’ M0’I'()R
-VVEHSCLES ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE
“y Mrsc. mas? APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND AWARD PASSED BY THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
as M.A.C.’I’., GULBARGA m M.V.C. 910.559/2004 nAf1fr£0»,_
01.02.2005 AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASE!) VA
AN 000130 THEREBY PAYING COMPENSATION {fa ‘
APPELLANT AS PRAYEE) FOR IN THE _– ” —
This M.F.A. commg’ on for this
RAG. J, delivered the foliowfingw
The ownerf. Vtvchicle were
respondent Nos4.’V1″‘:»_’a1;¢§ The case
against A’ dhmissed by the
Tribuna} ‘insurer-rrespondent alone
contested found that without the
pgfiver the question of negligence
decided. The ‘i’ribu.na1 incidentally also
appeiiant has not proved the
Vit;_iu1ie0″ ta; disability. Aoctmtiingly, d’mm1ssed’ the
owner and the driver who are necessary part1e’ 3
V I;ave not been served in the proceedings before the Tribunal.
It is therefore, just and necessary that the entire outer of the
mg/0
Tribunal is to be set asfie and the matter is A. V
Tribunal for issue of fresh dhposal.
3. The ‘!’ribuna1 shail issue fresh ‘ 7
M
” 1 V fildge
Rbv*