High Court Kerala High Court

Sidharthan @ Sanju @ Sanji Thomas vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 26 February, 2008

Kerala High Court
Sidharthan @ Sanju @ Sanji Thomas vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 26 February, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1064 of 2008()


1. SIDHARTHAN @ SANJU @ SANJI THOMAS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DILIP MOHAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :26/02/2008

 O R D E R
                                R. BASANT, J.

                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                          B.A.No.  1064 of   2008

                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

               Dated this the 26th day of  February, 2008


                                    O R D E R

Second application for regular bail. The petitioner is the

second accused. Altogether there are five accused persons. They

face allegations in a crime registered for offences punishable,

inter alia, under Section 395 I.P.C. Accused 1 and 3 to 5 have

come to this Court twice for regular bail and their applications

were dismissed. The petitioner had joined the co-accused in the

second application and his application for regular bail was also

refused.

2. The alleged incident took place on 19.12.2007. The

petitioner remains in custody from 22.12.2007. Facts have been

adverted to in detail in the order dt. 14.1.2008 in B.A. 183 of

2008. All the co-accused were arrested and have already been

granted regular bail. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents

of involvement in any theft or allied offences. He is an accused

B.A.No. 1064 of 2008

2

in a crime registered under Section 420 I.P.C. submits the learned

Prosecutor.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the learned

Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I am satisfied that the

petitioner, who remains in custody from 22.12.2007, can now be

granted regular bail, subject to appropriate terms and conditions.

This order must be read in continuation of the earlier order. I am not

hence adverting to facts in any greater detail in this order.

4. In the result:

1) This application is allowed.

2) The petitioner shall be released on bail on the following terms

and conditions.

(a) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.1,00,000/-

(Rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum

to be satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.

(b) He shall make himself available for interrogation before the

Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 10 a.m.

B.A.No. 1064 of 2008

3

and 12 noon for a period of three months and thereafter as and when

directed by the Investigating Officer in writing to do so.

(R. BASANT)

Judge

tm