IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.1235 of 2004
SIKANDAR SINGH SON OF LATE DEO KUMAR SINGH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KUTUBPUR, P.S. DORIGANJ,
DISTRICT SARAN
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
-----------
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Chandrasekhar, Sr. Advocate,
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha & Mr. A. K. Das
For the State :- Mr. S. S. Sundaram, A.C. to A.G.
For the Accountant General :- Mr. L. P. K. Rajgrihar, Addl.S.C.
——
5 08/07/2010 After having heard learned counsel for the
petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State, this Court
is not convinced about the submission made at the Bar that
the pay scale given to the petitioner and the order passed by
the respondents contained in letter No. 1966 dated 24.7.2003
contained in Annexure-7 really falls foul of any law.
However, there is insistence on behalf of the
learned counsel for the petitioner that looking at the higher
qualification which the petitioner had at the time of
appointment in the department which he had served, he was
entitled to a pay scale higher than the Bill Clerks of other
department. Since there was no recommendation of a
replacement pay scale of the kind which would have
accommodated the petitioner’s interest there is some
-2-
provision made in this regard, according to him, in resolution
no. 660/F/2 issued by the Finance Department dated 8.2.1999
which is paragraph 21 of the said resolution.
Let the petitioner take his chance with the State
authorities a second time over if he is so convinced about the
applicability of paragraph 21 in his case. So far as the
present writ application is concerned, no order is required to
be passed on what has been stated by way of relief.
This writ application stands disposed of.
AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)