High Court Kerala High Court

Sini Joy vs Director Of Public Instruction on 30 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
Sini Joy vs Director Of Public Instruction on 30 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 10210 of 2009(U)


1. SINI JOY, W/O.P.K. ALEXANDER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

3. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

4. CORPORATE MANAGER,

5. ANNIE G. VARGHESE, ANNIE BHAVAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :30/03/2009

 O R D E R
                              P.N.Ravindran, J.
                          ==================
                       W.P.(C) No.10210 of 2009
                      =====================

                Dated this the 30th day of March, 2009.

                                JUDGMENT

Heard Sri. S.Subhash Chand, the learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner and Sri. A.J.Varghese, the learned Government Pleader

appearing for respondents 1 to 3. In the nature of the order that I

propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to and hear

respondents 4 and 5.

2. The petitioner is presently working as Lower Primary School

Assistant (LPSA for short) in St.Mary’s Mahila Mandiramam Upper Primary

School, Adoor managed by the fourth respondent. A regular vacancy of

LPSA arose in the school on 1.6.2007. In that vacancy, instead of

accommodating the petitioner, the Manager appointed the fifth

respondent, a B.Ed. degree holder as UPSA. The Assistant Educational

Officer declined to approve the said appointment on the ground that the

vacancy of UPSA ought to have been filled up by accommodating a

protected teacher. The appeal filed therefrom was dismissed and the

Manager has filed Ext.P16 revision petition before the Director of Public

Instruction. The petitioner has filed Ext.P18 representation before the

WP(C) 10210/09 -: 2 :-

Director of Public Instruction staking her claim for appointment as LPSA

in the regular vacancy that arose on 1.6.2007 in the place of the fifth

respondent.

3. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner inter alia prays for a

direction to the Director of Public Instruction to pass orders on Ext.P16

revision petition and Ext.P18 representation within a time limit to be

fixed by this Court. The pleadings disclose that the fifth respondent was

appointed as UPSA against a regular vacancy of LPSA that arose on

1.6.2007 and that the Educational Officers have declined to approve the

said appointment. The Manager has filed Ext.P16 revision petition under

Rule 8A of Chapter XIV A of the Kerala Education Rules. The

appointment was made on 1.6.2007 and was rejected on 1.11.2008.

Since more than one year has passed after the fifth respondent was

appointed, it is only desirable that the Director passes final orders in the

matter expeditiously.

I accordingly dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the

Director of Public Instruction to pass orders on Ext.P16 revision petition

filed by the Manager and Ext.P18 representation filed by the petitioner

after notice to and affording the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 a

reasonable opportunity of being heard. Final orders in the matter shall

be passed within four months from the date on which the petitioner

produces a certified copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall in order

to enable the Director of Public Instruction to act as directed above,

WP(C) 10210/09 -: 3 :-

produce before him a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy

of this Writ Petition. This shall be done expeditiously and in any event,

within two weeks from the date on which the petitioner receives a

certified copy of this judgment.

P.N.Ravindran,
Judge.

ess