High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sita Ram Manjhi vs The State Of Bihar on 26 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Sita Ram Manjhi vs The State Of Bihar on 26 March, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Cr.Misc. No.32479 of 2010
                     SITA RAM MANJHI son of Raghunath Manjhi,
                     Resident of Mohalla-Vikash Nagar, Road No.2,
                     Hesag Hatia Ranchi (3), P.S.-Jagarnathpur,
                     District-Ranchi (Jharkhand)
                                   Versus
                              THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                  -----------

3. 26.3.2011. Heard Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner, who apprehends his arrest in

connection with Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No.290 of 2006

registered for the offence under section 409/34 of the Indian Penal

Code, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

It was alleged that the petitioner, who was posted, at

the relevant time, as a Divisional Accountant in Road Division No.1,

Aurangabad and other officials have not deducted the royalty from

the bill to the tune of rupees five lakh and odd. It was alleged that

the accused persons had misappropriated the said government

money.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that first

information report was lodged long back in the year 2006 and the

investigation is still pending, which has not been disputed by learned

Additional Public Prosecutor.

In view of the fact that investigation is pending since

long as well as the fact that the petitioner retired in the month of

December, 2009, the court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for

extending privilege of anticipatory bail. Let the petitioner, above
2

named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below

within a period of one month from today, be enlarged on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No. 290

of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2)

of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Md.S.                            ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)