High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sitaram Mallah vs The State Of Bihar on 15 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Sitaram Mallah vs The State Of Bihar on 15 March, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Cr.Misc. No.43219 of 2010
                   SITARAM MALLAH S/O HARIRAJ CHAUDHARY
                                       Versus
                              THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                      -----------

3. 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner

and the state.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case

instituted for the offence under Section 364(A)/34

of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the alleged

victim of kidnapping did not disclose the name of

the petitioner in his first statement but did so after a

year in his reinstatement and the petitioner has fair

antecedents.

Considering the same, let the petitioner

above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety to be

fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of

learned A.C.J.M., Bagaha, District- West

Champaran in connection with Piprasi P.S. Case No.

27/2004, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of

the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner

who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how
2

he is related with the petitioner and the other bailors

shall be the father/brother of the petitioner. The

bailors will undertake to furnish information to the

Court about any change in address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if

he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the

bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will

inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of

misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for

charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date if

he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

Fahad.                                 ( Anjana Prakash, J.)