IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.15356 of 2005
SITARAM SINGH KUSHWAHA SONOF LATE RAM
DAWAR SINGH KUSHWAHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
JIGINI (DAMODARPUR), P.S. BHABHUA DISTRICT
KAIMUR.
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE
CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR,
PATNA.
2. D.G. CUM I.G. OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA.
3. A.I.G. (WELFARE), BIHR, PATNA.
4. A.I.G. (PERSONNEL), BIHAR, PATNA.
5. D.I.G. (HUMAN RIGHTS), BIHAR, PATNA.
6. S. P. KAIMUR AT BHABUA
7. D.I.G. HOMEGUARD, BIHAR PATNA.
8. COMMANDANT HOME GUARD, BIHAR,
PATNA.
-----------
2 20/09/2010 This is the second visit of the petitioner. His
earlier writ application being C.W.J.C. No. 6858 of 2003
was disposed of with a direction upon the respondents to
consider the claim of the petitioner on the question of
granting certain benefits to him. A reasoned order has
now been passed contained in annexure-8. The order
states that there are no rules based on which the
petitioner can demand appointment as a constable or the
benefits merely because he received injury during the
course of so called performance of the duty because the
petitioner is or was a Homeguard and not holder of a
civil post as such under the respondent State. In absence
-2-
of any serious legal challenge to the reasons given in
annexure-8, no interference is warranted with the
impugned order dated 25.02.2004.
So far as the discrimination which is being
pleaded now by the petitioner in terms of his statement
made in paragraph 13 is concerned, a bald statement like
that does not make out a case of discrimination under
Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
This writ application is dismissed.
AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)