Hi’ ‘rI-$4 3-EGH COURT OF Kammraxn AT BANGALORE
mun ms THE W m? OF
BEFURE % A’ ”
Tm: HCWELE & ” }%
SEcI’§’.AJEE’FI~£&
W;’fiAfiHC3K aA;.’:2.u, ”
9.63: zs3YEm,= ~ I t:§CG:HOEI$E wIm:«:- A we Ififlfifii, & . ; 33', yrs cam E££)LI§$i§;~ x % ..PET1TIOREE Ifiigfifi Gm: _ _v S; G31 _ "PE: In-mzwan, msmmcr. ..Rmpo1mEm
.gH3:.$mG.s$vqAs.socIATEs, ABVS.)
‘THI8 ‘WRIT PE”I”I”l’I{.’}N I3 FEED {RIDER ARFIOLES 226
AREI 22*? 09 ‘i’1-{E mmmumon BF INDIA, PRAYIHG we
gnaw THE 031333 msszn BY THE mama 2!» mp1,.
awn sums gszwm nnaxwnn IR omvo. zaezzm-1 AND
THE mam’: na:rE9.3.:1.2oe7 VIBE ANl§EX–G ‘:0 THE
mm Fmmm A8 ILLEGAL Arm mcemmwom
AND EEC.
COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CODE? KfiRNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CQURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HSGH COUK
“IRIS ‘WRIT PETI’I’I{3H CGIBEHG ON FOR ORDERS THIS
IIAY, Tfi CQURT l€fiBE THE FflLLflW’H’IG:
L1/,
ZOURT OF KARN!:Wa%KA HIGH K(_\]§NATAl<A HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1
11: this mt petitian under Amazes 2% of
the: mmufmttnn of India, the p::t:iti«;:2;V§1'«.u.:':¢§ffl in
qumfian me mam»
cam. in a:v.3.No.13:a;2oM¢a:;'1a.T ujs 131 _
2 'rue 15: of cm,
pxayixzg 'tn; The
'arm' itfiszazzst }m_ and d1rex::ted'
ta 1'€}.::.'§":§ _Eas lnaue.
gm}
._§;:1ra;%a:¢:f1#iiad that, though ihmza was as praym: in that
in hm imsuse N::.7 as preliminary “same, the
. Q-mart has a}1r.:wcsd am said applicatien and
thgzfiafixre, the impugxzz-Ed aréer atarmt be sustained in
law. fig alas submmed that, the mama’ requjx-as
atsidazms aw tha&m§ the Hui! Csurt, was nntjxxstifiad
in allrszwirg {ha appfieafien, He, m-mam, submitted
wdm amzrmt be sumzaixzeci in law.
141/
As agaixzat 1%, the Iamwm mqzmd for thc
zfigpaxrsfient mzbmifiefi that tim trial into
rsmmifimatiszzzn 12$ ardcx pamad by 4,
:»Ja.1*?§}2;2ma amfi; aim
fizayrmsz mm £3 3;? Fx¢.3x33Os;:0%joF%FF
Z€::.3’E’53}E€K32} Né;’f?* aa
i§w*1:g:, F:1um’e::i§on of law, anti
thmfamé does mt mil for
mmfgxaaca,
_ ____ Vaezamflerafi the submisaiom
‘céuzlsei far the pa:-nea.’ .
” ‘ V. that amm’ far rny mfnmdzea.-3′ tian is,
, ;§}«:ié:”§fi1pugnad aside: 35:. 1% far ‘ ‘i’
It is raimm tn mm the suit is fir
. OF O%m,:m that the deem wsaad in G.S.Hc.T0.f 1993 is
COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH A HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA H16′-H COURT OF KARNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA I-liGH COUR1
Faia m_11l:i’t}-2 3% caurt it]. C.R.P.Hxs,1′?92,’ 2900
the at’ am wmpmmiaea has dacrwé tm suit in
GmS.§m’?flEf §§%. , the mafia}? has bee:r1 taken
in Banfiw Supmnw ilaufiz in Civi}; Appeal H.3′?’53[ 2002
IOURT OF K.£%E’NATA!(A HIGH KQRNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUIH1
$1.? §«<.:e,2§3'28;"' 20%} 32$ éha E-§e11'b1c S-ujggr-mne 'Sour:
hfla (":3 .'£:;;' :- '-
Q. Tim mfifiznfl baa WW’.
pafiaté; in 9ms.:mm;
mzsmififi-aratimn the arfiatj g,}g,aho
tha H-az*:iz:’§1e 1 Appeal] has
fimafi mm[.%%§ag,éfL ma R0,’? relates
maifiiéaixmigélity-afiikg: gr rm» judmmt cf tbs
Km 31;? xamagaxaam {Civil
fit: is & pure: qumfigzsn of law.
‘fiamrt hm giixnctad. tn hear Issue
fi”:§’.L'{ 135 I den mt find any error or
1
wider’ pamaeé the ‘trial Cczurt,
*_E;5z*9£m:;e, in my Efififiidflfifi viaw, there is an mmit in
gtitimn we ham § it is name to he diamisaad.
§éQ% § it is fiismisssaai,
% 9 Sd/-1
“£*’3i’».s_f — ” Judge