High Court Kerala High Court

Smt. Annamma Varghese vs Regional Transport Authority on 8 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Smt. Annamma Varghese vs Regional Transport Authority on 8 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32594 of 2010(Y)


1. SMT. ANNAMMA VARGHESE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY,

3. SMT. GRACY THOMAS, ALAPPAT HOUSE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR

 Dated :08/11/2010

 O R D E R
                         C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J
           - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                   W.P.(C)No. 32594 OF 2010
           - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

         Dated this the 8th day of November, 2010


                           J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a regular permit holder operating

an ordinary service on the route Wadakkancherry – Ayyanthole

with the stage carriage bearing registration No.KL- 8/U 4032.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent who

is granted with a regular stage carriage permit to operate on

the route Vadakkanchery- Palakkad with vehicle bearing

registration No.KL-8/AL 3274 as a limited stop fast passenger

is illegally stopping on each and every stop fixed for ordinary

services. Raising such grievances and making objections

against the aforesaid alleged action on the part of the 3rd

respondent, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P3

representation. The grievance of the petitioner is that the

respondents are not taking appropriate action on Ext.P3.

The learned Government Pleader, on instruction,

submitted that the 3rd respondent is operating his fast

passenger service based on the permit strictly adhering to the

permit conditions. However, it is submitted that in case, the

WPC.32594/2010
: 2 :

3rd respondent, or in that matter any of the permit holders

violates the permit conditions, definitely appropriate action

under the provisions of the Act, would be taken. This is

recorded. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

(C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)

jma
//true copy//

P.A to Judge