Posted On by &filed under Allahabad High Court, High Court.

Allahabad High Court
Smt. Anuradha Yadav W/O Manoj … vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic … on 29 January, 2010
Court No. - 23

Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 467 of 2010

Petitioner :- Smt. Anuradha Yadav W/O Manoj Kumar Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Education & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Balram Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.Sc..,B.L. Verma

Hon'ble Shabihul Hasnain,J.

Heard Mr. Balram Singh learned counsel for the petitioner
and Sri B.L. Verma learned counsel for the opposite party
no. 3.

For the proposed order it is not necessary to issue notice to
opposite party nos. 4 and 5. However, since there are
disputes which are factual in nature and the District
Magistrate being the Chairman of the District Level
Committee is the best authority to look into the factual and
legal aspects of the petitioner’s case, the petitioner is given
the liberty to approach the District Magistrate with a fresh
representation annexing all the necessary documents.

If such a representation is filed along with the certified copy
of this order, the District Magistrate shall look into the matter
and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with
law after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as
well as the opposite party nos. 4 and 5 within a period of one

With the above observation the writ petition is finally
disposed of.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

93 queries in 0.165 seconds.