IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT I3ANOAI_,OERE._V
DATED THIS THE 6"" DAY OF NOVEMEER.__;{(§II<;«';..[ ;_. A'
BEFORE V
THE HON'BLE MR. }USTlCE H.NANASAMC}H1A.N"DAV§-..__«
WRIT PETITION NO;32298/2I§(i9IL-8-ISLE.) :1
BETWEEN :
Smt. B BHARATHI
W/O. MVENKATES-H V
AGED AEOuT3m'««E2xRs=:._ :;
R/O. NO. I34,__I,E I
NISARGA LAYOUT
BANNERVGIHVATTA 'D V
.FIGANII}1OBLI"~.j_V _
ANE'I<AE_TAEu.I< * , "
BANGALORE uREVAI*-II_OjVDIs<Ii;:"'
(BY S112; HLSRIDHARI'v;AD'v.j'"
E. '; ''1vsTA'I'EIjOEKARNATAIANCHAYATH: RA}
i7\\'VV
~ 5 BUILDING
*-- BANGALORE, -- I.
PETITIONER
2. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
MARKETING FEDERATION BUILDING
CUNNINGHAM ROAD
BANGALORE
BY ITS SECRETARY. .
3 THEIMRECTOR
PANCHAYATHRAJAND .A-_
EXJMWUCKLKHNTSECRETARY _ _
DEPT1M3RURALDEVELOPMENTfI'
ANDPANCHAYATHRAIr_ ' =
NISBUHJMNG "w
BANGALORE
4. ELm:n0Nc0NmMs$0NERA&n»j;
sUB[nv$KMqC0wmmsmQNER_'_E .
BANGALORESOUTHSUBIMVflflONafl*
BANGALORE _ " *~."J¢ '49
5 THECTHEFEXECUTHHZOFHCER
ANEKALTALUKPANCHAYATH
ANEKAL _';.",*»=
BANGALORE, g*,} MIHEPONDENTS
(BYsgi2DEVDA&}vh§F0R£L1&3
"'SmPANHwmwyADv;F0RRa&un
'GfHm;fi@wfPETn10N1sFnJ1)UNDER,MwncLEs226
~A.ND "22"Fg OE THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WITH A
"'»~'.._I'PRAYER.v_7TO QUASI-I TI-IE ELECTION NOTIFICATION
' IIVVIIETTER AND CALENDER OF EVENTS DATED 26.1().2()09
A/TIDE ANN'EXURE F AND ETC.
d'"""'
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING THES DAY, THE COURT PASSED
THE FOLLOWING;
ORDER
Respondent issued a nOtific:.ItiOn On l5.()5_I2I).(V)9I:V};Is L’pcI*-«T
Annexure B to hoid eiection to the Ot’t’i0e Of PI§eSi_dciIIt–
President Of Anekal taluk panch2Iy2Ith_I’0seI’ViIIg’thc pOst–“.Off ‘p:’E:$id’eII”t<
for backward category (women) post V(')E'..\/'i"<;eV«':;3I*O:.<;:idcnt to
scheduled caste Category. TfiI§'~I1()[i36.i:b€t[IA()'1}:. to be qII ashed by
this Court in W.P. NOS. I3822mV2'9/20009' ~}Ide:'~gi%aé?I-;»dIm:I 14.09.2009
and directed the '~1fivfi$vpOI1;V?Ci'€'IEE'=$"KI 'nOId.e}ectiOns tO the Anekal taiuk
pLlI1C-h21y£t[h'* as" p€i"_filégl'C!'1.§I:V'.31{i()l] in the noaificzution dated
()5.()5.20–O9. SIIIOI; 'I7é"S[I_)(.) §'1d{")z'I.].[.'s' failed to hoid the elections as per
E'II0diVIec{'tiOfIA:'+ O'I"..this COIITIA In W.P. Nos. E3822A29/2009, a Contempt
peIi%LIg§I'cm-ct::I§%'VIII;:'_1§IIecI before this Court in ccc No. 757/2009.
NOW 0,3 per 'A_tIftIéxure F the respondcms have issued notice dated
hoid eiections to the Anekal taluk pam:hay2ItE_I
_rC:sé:'"ving the post Of president for geIIeI'2I% category and the post Of
T i"=\%i.d-CV-p1'€Sid€I1[ for bzlckwzud ciass women category. In this writ
cum»
petition the petitionei' is eaiiing in question Annexure F –v_IV'1(,_)'[iL'¢
dated 26.10.2009.
2. Heard iearned counsel for both the p§14IT'[i'{‘3S”‘§LI1.d’ })v€_i’USCt§ the_
entire writ papers ” V x
3. Armexure F dated 26. iU.2()’U9:iVSSLl€d bVy._t_he is
in eoinpliaiice of the direct.ioi1s_ 1 Nos.
13822-29/2009. It is not Si1(V):”\?:\’/I’3!’_l’:Cr’ notice at
Aimexure F is ;C(‘)i*.’£7:3’_£§_.i’y to t;he7 govei*ri.i’1iei1_Lf notification dated
05.05.2009″hievziriiiéN(>.’ii:CiA.»§i’f;~?iii\i’t’AX'($3)/G-PASA/2009. F-til'[h€1″ in
the impugiieti ‘notice0tit:’Aiiih~:20i§’u<:7r3" F ii is aiso specified that the
resei'vat':o.i1 of iiost of7'p1"esideTnt and vice~pi'esident is as per the
iiioti£'i.Veatioi1"*déitegi ()5.0'Si?.t}()9. In the ci.i'cumsta1ices I find no
ju.siitTiahtev..T"giouifid_}~to interfere with the impugned notice.
0 Aeeo1.'-d__.ingI_y,~E.h;{%=W1-it petition is hereby dismissed. ,3 ,
Sd/~
JUDGE
" LLRS;/()7; £2009