IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAR'NA'1"AI(A AT BANGALORE '.
Dated this the 20"' day ofMarch, zoos " '
Before
21%;. ..0N'.B.LE i,-.ta:.,Lr..9--_.I5.' H.V"r_:._n;4 ,_.., _
4.-2 /2:233 -'«. £39 I-462/2!}e?§ {LR}
Between:
Smt Bhavani, 75 yrs
W/o Seshappa Saphalya
R./near Kamataka Bank
Thokottu, U1lalVillage_ VVVV --.
MangaloreTa1uI< _ _ ~ " Petitioner '
(By Sri Pundikai i'sh':yai;.Ei3)at if V
And: ____ :7 V' .. . .
1. sxi-at Lasssiugii;-'::2V.yi~s, D:'o:K.~isfmzimma
R/a Mahalinga Ccfnpoiind
Near Atnbedkaf'--NIé'idan, hifqkottu
Ulla} vflIage,"Ma;igalc---fir Taluk
" '~ ._ '3Smt._i}cc1a, 47Ajirs,v V-IA?9'K1ishnamma
_ Pu/a"1\3Eahaiinga Compmind
' =Nea1f Ambgdkar Maidan, Tokottu
U'iia1:"v.«"'g}lage,.Mar.galo:e Taluk
__ Land Iviarngai"-e
By its; Chairman
Talul: Office Buildings, Mangaiore
SJ.)
V' v 'State of Karnataka - by its Revenue Secretary
"M 8 Building Bangalore 1 Respondents
~ j ‘ 43,5,’ s1«.iva_-uindappai (312 for 123-4;
= Sri M Viswajith Rai, Adv. for R1-2)
Hg__/
This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1, CPCT»-praying to
review the order dated 29.1.2008 in WP 1462/2008. d . .,
I-is a VF:-:1′ run:-1:15 nr –
This Review Petition coming on for Orders this theirnatiefl
HIV J.iJ’.I.I\lVVl.Il5n
Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the cotinsehreieresenting the
respondents.
extent of 4 eente the review .petitio_ner isfisaid’ possession as ‘
As per the suhmission. made hyitlte’ gzetitioner-‘si counsei, they have removed the
tiles to carry otit’ the reflairs -end at that juncture the impugned order came to
be passed’ eyrparte. ‘
In;–the’vioircmnetaitcee, the review petition is allowed. WP 1462:2003
deeided is restored on Board and the order passed therein is
‘petitioner herein. As per the su’ornitt*d Dy” th
modified as 11.-titer;
A it .n pa-_a. 5 -f t._e _-l.’1|:I_’ i_- WP 1462I__(_)08, the 1″ respondent therein was
e ‘ t 91 ‘ ‘ ‘
(nu W £6 rnarruatn stantsnuo The 1 ran-,,.o:~.dent t.’:ere.n is. …e l’..-E’l9’J”.”
– _ I…
the survey, as on the date, the 1%’ respondent (review petitioner) is in
Jkr
U:
Sdh
possession of the house as per the area mentioned in the sketch to thetipextent of
4 cents. In the circumstances, it is ordered the possession of the 1?
shall continue till the order is passed by the Land Tribunal V’ .
law. Further, it is needless to say that since tiieii-eview ‘petitioneiiieiiigiithel ‘1″ b
–_pondent in the said writ petition is said to he.in’possession, she ‘wouiii~
this cm dineetmg ‘h’ L–e “H-1–.–.-:V.:.~.e–;a-~ ~ ~’– -we – ~ –*«-A
with law would sustain. contentio1:_sv}ere to be urgea before the
Land Tribunal.
thehwfitiipetitioie modified. Review petition is
disposed es’.
Iuciga