High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Bhimavva Kadam vs B S Vastrad on 22 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt Bhimavva Kadam vs B S Vastrad on 22 October, 2008
Author: Deepak Verma B.Adi
IN THE HiGH COU'hT OF KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD _
DATED THIS THE 22"" DAY OF OCTOBER 

PRESENT    %
THE HOEWBLE MRJUSTICE DEEPAK '%   
AND     
THE HQNBLE    '   
c.c.c.n:o.1o19j/goosktcnm   % 1 '  
BETWEEN:   A   

Smtfihimawa  ' .   :
W/0 Sr!   .  '
Aged about 63   '  .
Refined  ., ' '
Pattan,Pa11cl3ajva$, * *    
HavcriDistIict, * V 'i   
R/o   
31353880 T:8i31ks'~ " .
Haven Dismct  A. .. ..... ..

 A V    ....coMm:.AINAN'I*
   ~  -._(}_3y Sri Shivraj Paul, Adv.)

,  Deputy Commissioenr,
 . Havgri--,,Dist:r*ict,

 

....RESPONDENT'

(By Sri C.S.PaIJ’1, Am.)

“M… We

Matter stands remitted back to 3″‘
for nmzstderatton cy’?’esh, with a do to
the light of the notifications issued ‘%
wmn a period afszx months thgataxe
ofa copy ofthis order.

With time ‘
by the petitioner o_uf.”–‘V'[‘j .o 9’ ” _V

4. Peru_ sal of as day that, period
of limitation ofE:~’;i:§:7-.’ofgo1ifE1s–. i§ofii§1: running only afier tlfm
ooznplaixmnffilciv order before the Deputy

Commissioner, Have:ri. , ” ‘

“‘5. complainant was not abk to give us

the the certified copy of the order was

befomn Deputy Commissioner, Haveri. However,

‘B’ dated 16.7.2008 shows that, on the

had approached the asocusod for taking up his matter.

o Atoomsa; it can be taken that, on the said date he might have

the certified oopy of the order before the said Authority,

even. though his representation is not very clmr on this issue.

Thus, in any case, a period of six months has not expimd from

16.7.2008.

Thus, according to us, pzwesentlymhthis

premature. It is accordingly hereby f-L z;_ A’