High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Buvaneshwari vs Smt. Nagamalli on 11 July, 2011

Karnataka High Court
Smt Buvaneshwari vs Smt. Nagamalli on 11 July, 2011
Author: Jawad Rahim


“‘§{}’:>sME:?aé

{N THE HIGH comm” OF K}f\RN1i{TAK-A, AT4’i3fiAY’0.F’:t;LYT.2’é::’ .

THE HON”BLE MR,3usfi«::?:E _’:_;;\wé\:-“3 %gAH::v};

H.R.R.P. No. :4<~:w12_g3_,10 N.’s”:ko%4 10

BETWEEN: ‘ ~ .

SMT.BU\fANESHWAR-I

D/O MUNISWAM’gfi”f~1.£¥j’OR,.””»L,_ ‘
N0.11032;’1..??–RoADg
EX-M_E…A’–..S R5{N__I;_\fASAN .VBU:.L:::NG,
PERIVAR,-“r{A’G;é.R ”

D_.J_,HA£,L’1 ‘misx .R:’>_Aa~–
}3ANGA.:3i>RE’;”§V”

._ % % PETITIONER IN BOTH CASES

(BY SR: HARli<F§ISE%NA..S';-HCELLA, ADV.)
AND: V. ._ "

, ~ SMT.Ns1€3A?4ALL;L,
W/0 MAS’fLALW-‘..NL , No.9, NEW LINE
C3{3E-C}NY, Do:j’§:>ANNA NAGAR

» £{A’JELBYRASANDRA;

” R ;”‘%T_,NAG.A.R (P)
A BA;%;”@..A’;:;ORE~32.

.. RES?’GNSENTI{\§ EQTH @553
{BY W5, £;§ABDi.§L RASHEED & ASSQCIATES, Abvsg

V HRR? zg $15.59 152$ 46{:} Q? K.R.,ACT; AGAINST ‘mg
myrga S~iG-.?,GC*9 PASSES Ira:

%%§RiZ,%aJ$e€:52;§;’2;QCI8 ms “mg FELE 8? THE XE gags” Q2223:

“‘”§i§$SE; QQURT SF S§’€ii’:LL CAUSES Pv’§EE’v’¥5EF%; BANGALGRE


J

Mursiswamy, by operation of law, became her

ciefawted in payment of rents resuéting in V’

notice dated 14§10.2GG6 which wes–net–con-§4’p¥ieci’;.*VI.’ .

4. The respenderzt resisted the p_receei;iir;gs._

vincuium juris of ianciierd anci;tenant;’;_H’e bregygiétvietzt iI3C”Ce

and circumstances which discE’icrse’d_there_ serious
dispute with regard to’rti:_ie Tine same
defence was taken by fe;gVei_nst whom the
petitioner iiaci§.iii”:’i:ic:£§e’i:ed Some ef the
petitions wiére’T:.’i:e.é”re.. .._;§:’re’i’i:»rr;~i~eary point regarding
jurai re’i’3ti’oi°:sf§:ie.e§sV”§stinder Section 43 of the
i<arnateV'K.a'Rer2t: triai judge eensidering

the materieii"prepes§_tie.ri"siri the pieadings and evidence ied;

c!ai'm«.ef..i1:ne petitioner that she has absolute

ti:ie.~V.Ti-ive4V'e;;i'i«ne'ci._that the issue inveived a seriees questéen

ef.€*i:§e Vteiflbievidecided by a civii seem: at' competent

'.VjeréseEet;%'eri. x These erders were asseiied by the petitéener

%%*;.;1§{.R:Pc1S1;'1§ and connected matters. These petitiens

— are-ereiiiheerd en meri’: end by ercier dated E4£3VI2®E:i were

eésreéssee reeuéring her ie have her right eejeeieeitee ie a

“‘7?

3
2 E
H