High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Bylamma vs Sri R Krishna Murthy on 8 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Smt Bylamma vs Sri R Krishna Murthy on 8 June, 2009
Author: V.Jagannathan


‘s
;

1?»? THE Hifffiri QUEER’? OF’ KARNATAEQQ AT BA?J{}E\%,£}RE;

BEIT’%§fE3E§’=£:

ifiatfitiz This the 83% day Gf €_.§!_.1I.’1{:-: 2(}{;$9

BEFCERE

THE H()’:\E’BLE MRJLESTEQEE xx.gAg;A1\3NAT§{,g3§§_ ‘;_V

M.FKA,N{j3. i”311f2i}{}8

SM? £3″:’i,A§s.«€{ MA
w / (.1 :,ATE:.K:>®MAiAH, T
AGEIB A88??? 52 YEARS, ”

E3/A’1′.AL£_1;EE% VILLAGE,

NEAR MAKALI;

§E::i.’~J,’;

§>Ar~éA.t.:RA N€;;>R”i’1~§ 1*§g_g:;; Q

Z\§ELz%.MAN{}ALA§
BAN<Z'xAL(;}RE_i RURAL Ag:

{Egg S?y£’F: E<:E§:;E?fi;}f§';=% %am ,}

AN?) :

1

._?f$R§§*Rf :<:R::s§:1m EviL§E€'E'I~{'f
~ S/{'§..R"A NG,z%M?g1AI~£,

W . _E€fVAT,Iv§§5;'2~§BI}R POST,
. *:*I.;:x,z.1<Lr::m:§i?;2 3.9:,

.».. :%3A':?:.<§:§.<AfiJ INSURANCE. <::<::z LETE}
'REGIONAL ?:4’1<:§:,

" 5APPE.LL&N"1'

S:-;g.:~¢§«:ARA:6G {:9 L .

l _{B;_;; Sri: (3 §ziAHE1SE,££>’if.3 page R?)

.. RESPOEDENTS

.?!fi§’A. FELED 13/ 8 3313(3) 0?’ MV A£;T, AGAENST
THE »3UB€L§EEy§.ENT AND fiwfifii} Dfis.’I’EZI) €}8.{§i%f2{3{}t’:i

PASSEZB EN .;;’\£i’»fC N{3.2642/2005 GK THE: FILE OF’
I\:’iEMVBE’.’iR§ MAC”, X ABI3’I’I’§ON’AL JUDGE,
BAE’~f(}AL()I53ZE5 SC;CH–« E6, PAR’l’L-Y ALLQWENG THE
CLAIM PETITION FOR CEGMPENSATION

SEZEKENG E-)NHAN{,’:E2\.:1I;T:N’1′ OE’ <:{3MPE§~:sA*r:0:§§' ~.

'1'iriIS APPEAL cfiomirm ON £505: c)R{:'Ej"Ez::;;=V:"fIé:%;<5:» A"
DAY,"E'HE3 CQUR'?D.E:L1VE}RE';£)'FH_E.A»FQ4LL(;iiéV'¥E%'G.i;» "

.:U§a~am1~I4':e: X
Heard Eéatned <:01111sc::'i'–vL3E%371*,ti1<aVh p;a11fti=s,=;:'_=i1;i"1:%§S71:£ct
af appeal p1"ef:?§1:'.f_€ci .":::1j_£ Q.1ain1a3d§t "éeeiififzg

ealhancfizitzérifr. of '¢:e1:1p¢I3sa"1f;i€}:};-

" ._ firxis Cent': heard {ha paztias

on thfi ;<,';;.p{;)ii::z:13;i::§1j1"~f"iVieé on dfiiay Ciknémlatiaii

<::<:};_{:i:'E:e2§;»:;£i1":.g '1'_§"A:é;€"'**~7?ii§I'E is a deiay of 533 days in

' i;":«Vff5£E%:1f1?i;§i:g.4"§;;3}36a§.

3; ' ~. "S'L1'§)i}f§.iSSiOI'}. 0f '€116 263371166: Cfliiflfifii fer €516

..i::Lsu:'a§-15:36 coxnpany is that, 3. perusal of tha afiidavit

' '~ f'§1:::? by the appellant, accompanyiug the appiicatien

" $23? dfi.-13,3: canqimnatien, mveais that though the zxzatmr

was igiispasad 93" O11 Q6, 80p}? sf tbs award was

._ f