High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Chandramma vs The United India Insurance Co Ltd on 18 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt Chandramma vs The United India Insurance Co Ltd on 18 March, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar


.1-

IN me HIGH COURT OF_KARNATAi)§”}Vfi*.4fi;A!§6_Ai._o7Ri§

omen THIS me 16*?

%

THE HON’BLE :»-»42«.JusT3;cé%.§&f:;:e4AN Suanrameouoaa

Smt. Chialidiiignlnfi. » 4′ . r
W/O “{~§%i1’3.g’1l;u¢: ” _ ” ”
A£e.’33 yams ‘ 1 1
00:5; Acter _» V a
Marathi Natgra Qgngha . . ‘ ..–~
Hosa}1i’Yél1;§u;j;’a. Talnk
Koppal ” ..Appc1lmt

Qnan§iiaa:w,km- P Patil, Adv.,)

H * India Inaulanec

Company Limited
Gagxdhi Chock, Raichur
12:23: by is Divisional Manager.

– Maflflvva

S/0 Eashappa Bzmgri

A86 Major

R/o Hire V m

Yclburga Taluk

Koppal District. ..Rcspondemts

(By Sri B. Shawna Bastwa, Adv., for R2)

-2-

This MFA filed under 36(!t_1_|’.Gfl.._].’73(.1 )V
the judgment and award datcél ‘ _:
No.25/’2(}()’2 on than fiic of that dudgt: 8:; lw!A£’–‘F,. Koppal,”

partly al!owm’ g the chum” petition fbr mid
cnhanccmcnt ofcofH$l3Cns£f50E:.4.. V .

This MFA comizlg on _vhcafi1agT, thisi§day the (mart
dclivemd the following; ” * ‘A ‘ ”

‘I’hi,-3 claixnarxb-appellant
awanied by the

_ %

. _ icam’ ed advocates appearn’ 13 on behalf

v . 335;. _rue’ and’ perused the material on moord.

« the accident that oecurred on 24.5.2001,

(:ig§iirj{a:1t~appcflant su1i’er<~:d multiple laoemtsecl would

" 'm;{er V'tt1e face and tear to pinna. She has also aruifewtzt

of left knee joint with disloca-{km as is clmr from

' the wound cetfificate Ex.P–6. The '£'ribunai in all has

awarded compensation of Rs.72,.00G/- undcr vmious

heads.

M

-3-

4. The claimant was i11p;at.i¢:m

days. First.ly,. she: took ‘A

thereafter, she took i.n at
Gadag. Thougll file ».i_ s _.i.13.1’s3i;i:£;ixad §i:1 awe:-d’mg
Rs.3<),00U/— under pain and strfiering,
Rs.20,O0O/'V—' tzxptznseas and
Rs. during the laid up
compensation Imdcr

the of cal' life.

L5. ‘4 has opined that the claimant has

to35% disability of the whole body because

I sustained by her. The same is

The doctor whey issued the disability

A. is in the habit of issuitxg such with

assessment of disability. Hcwever, having

regard to the fact that the claimant has suiiiamti two

injuries and as the czlaimant. is a drama artist, this Court

awards Ks.30,000/— under the head 01’ loss of imzure

In/S

-4-

amonitieo of life. As the claimant is aIi’*3;ffifit,:~:::Bl1fi

maintain her facial structure 7&3; ao-Aptfé:si:t.1tfibi¢:’ i.’u_ I

vim of the same, the ”

under the heat! of koss of of

6. The 1iis.10,000/–

towards i’ut:L11’e ‘i’m1s, in oi} the
cnmpenoagfiml of
awarded by the ‘I’1’ibu.:)ai
beIow,__ ‘.»it_l2r:f claimant is entitled to tow

oom1§cx1 satio:3. Ac.-.co:=cnngly, the fioammg

Voids: is Iflfitiéi ‘

of the ‘l’ribu;ua1 is modified. ‘l’ho oiain1a11t-

” is awarded to total cozupexlsatima of

i,.§J’.2,;00U/- (Rupees One laid; two umuaand only )

2 ~ ‘T Lwhiokl is iliciusivo of the amount already awarded by the

Tribmlal, with 6% intemst p.a. on tho enhanced

compensation iivom the data of }_.)t§ULi0il till the date of

realization. Award shall be drawn aooordingty. o1’thAc

V5

-5-

award ammmi. shall be deposited
J:3(«mk of the claimant’s choicfé
‘ ‘he ciaimam-appellant» _ is .. Lt»heA
accrued interest

amount shall be aiszg-msssd’:¢¢;sé%%’c;gimm;t–appenanL

Appw.1fi3__ ‘V