High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt D N Gangalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt D N Gangalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 December, 2008
Author: H.Billappa
u -urns': vr1[r'\l\rI

.....,. . ...uum vr umumnmnn HIGH couarr OF KARNATAKA HIGH coma

IN TEE HIGH COURT OF KARIHATAIEA AT BANGALORE

DATE!) THIS T}-3 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 

BEFORE

wanmwmmwm¢mmxmH3mwm%p [=2

 

sm.1:m.<:2AHaA1mm,
wxemmumm,  

AGED Anomesvmm-,.  %  J X _
mrAA.I~:.<:omsY,    
K.E.B. ROsAD,8lD11AIflA1'.!_.   ~kmw.ni,  

[av smvxvngx    '
amu~ _*"L %%%% % '

:. ma mam kor  %
REP Bi' ms  
nzpnmtmairr as FAEILYAKD
<:m'r,.D wmmans,   %
ll.£3.Etf~!1J)lI'I{3,_. é

   ..... 

11!mEG’1’OR cm wmmu

” cnmxnsrmmmm

_ 3. ‘?£5.¥.iE’;.BEL-EETIOH GORIEIITEE FOR
L V A. RE€R'(.TI1’hIElI’i’ OF AKGAITWILDI
V -ARE? BY’Ii’$ CHAIRHAH,

THE EEPUTY DREGTOR OF WOIIEH
AND »’.3HII.D,(}HIK8A’BALI.AP’UR DISTRICT,
SIIIIAGHATPA TOWN,
SIDIAGHATTA.

4. THE CHILE IJEVELO?llIEN’!’ OFFICER,
3§’)LAGHATTA TAIJUK, V.

(E? am. ‘I’.’.P.Sm1I’r9’A3,AGA3

“£333 wart Pmmor: mm ‘ m”1:”z ‘.v. 2’26’ ;
AND 227 0? THE ccnsnnmflfi CF fin ‘

Ema? ‘rm memmznrs 1’%’ro»4*A1¢o’r fro, HA.T§T..TH.E

Rxciwnmmm 1=12o-was 1%? THE mm’ oF*V–£aNGA1IiKVi’AD:,

arr Azmmcaam Axmmwanx zw1.wRA.A~_smmGHAnA
Town 111 mmuancz V%%%»k_.22.2.2oc5 mun: mm

mm wm Emma ‘cu; rmznmmmr
magma m I%.G£0§3’F’2’1Ei3.E %nmr, sum: mm

Heard % }»9arr1e:lA & fa;-L petitiranar and

aka the

% % 2. xmhs. under Articluu 226 and
:2? sf of India, the petitioner has

= n h V V directing the respondents-

t.n 4 the panama of mcru:i1::n:r1.t to the past

wrorlew at Aaadxmm anganawadi
1 13″ Ib”n’

.. ….— – nun – v..-urw-__* ‘\n nrsnuvnlnnn HIV” \.\JUN” VT KRKWAIMKA 9115″ COURT OF

14/