Smt D Neetha vs Jayathirth.S.Galagali on 9 December, 2009

"WWW" W" "'m"WWW*"" *'W~im N-VUM WM?' mnmmmamnm nmvn yuan: ur nnxmmnnn !'1Ha'!"l %..UUKI ur AARNATAKA HIGH CQURT 0?' KAEMAVflBfi HIGH QQURW

IN THE HIGE COURT OF KARKATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE cam my 0? nmcmmmn 2009' 

BEFORE

ms Hormm mm. mmam H.H.mmuoz~u;15tj   T' V'   A 

 

amt) NEETHA 
W/OSRIVIJAYKUHAR v A "

AGED QSYEARB

se+;s,psn1mm - A  t   
312:: mm, IiEARHEBBAL.F'i¥GVER"'»,_ '

  ' f;."; mrrrrxozmxz

(By sms ADV.) } 

A@

1    

mmmnm, KARRATAICA memmmns
  HOUSING

 % ~  socmv LIMYI'ED
 Rc:a»zjn'0%21c;, 2w moor:



    TI-E sficnnmnv
   =z:m2m*rA1'1'%'ro 

AHEAD wrm nm ALLonmN’r 0F’».Sfl’ES. %

Foamnama arm anmoarrsr LIST AND xymma
Ulmaoma PRICES ma amnmgns Arm Asaocmm
BEMBERS AND DIRECT ’11m%Jc3nm1?EGIs1R5R OF
C0-OPERTNE 30CIETE,_S;. EEAR ‘IT-E
nrrmzm Am.IcA’r1cm JRBI MD! 5712009
vim Amzzx-A mm DI$B’JSE4_ mm ’10
um URGEHCY nrymwsm IN jf’I}IE..’VD_ISPL¥TE.

THIS w..z=. my 71»’oR ‘mEmmmzy
1-mmxm mam; ’11-m
V
Sri A , learned t

2;”%’Imj of the peuaom is that than third

V “refused to consider and pans appmpwiate
the Imzerloeutoty Ammaon mad by the
’11 dispum sagas/nm;5712ao9 pmxiing on
me. He prejudice will be eauaead to the am:

rasponda1tifad%nis’msuedmwsa§.pp::13ps:1hw

§*'<-\x~"""'°~'""

tan: smug Lu .-_