High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt G Rathnavati Rao vs The Land Tribunal on 5 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt G Rathnavati Rao vs The Land Tribunal on 5 November, 2008
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit
8E"%"\fi.fE§?s%:___  5f[ . ;. * "

3.

 M _

:9; ms ;»%:§§~§ cam? Q? %<AR§*§ATA5<é AT a,§§s%<3.:x;;;§<%_§;vE¢%% ::_  _

EATED THEE THE $53' DAY 3? s'\2Q\g'E§%i.;%'x¥é4R;,.VV2€§:Cf:8_A "  

Paasamf

we :-«siazxsme MR. RD. §::§Am'Rg§e; C:-§;T;.=~:s'i*;.%:.3fsfr1§;E'%' %

Axi'':a... & V
we HQSXVBLE i§€¥'?g.3%jS;%§CE':«§;'w.%S;«.SABH$§?-{ET
wax? ,&9?§5s;; :s;s;:i}ai:93;?2vé§ATa%%{am

gem? G..§§;r§.'§"§'4;1?fs§}-'§'f;i§5é'§f1' RAG
we: mTEV.;<.%§SH§;=gsgV--aA0
AGES. ,-ma'3;:.;e"rj?'53 ":'§ ARZ$

$223 "2¢:~«;9a"2<ué'-;3:5i&i%§T:; PGS?"
_£_.§§£}§I~m5}T+'§?;L}2  

 GSC %~¥G§§_jE ¥.«"v'IFEg5

% 31%;: G 'R,a.GHAvEwaRA RAG

3  _ ';5;C'V§,§&TE"KESHAVA RAG

.fi~';=GE'D;_.I15€2'i}T 35 YEARS

 {~30 2%-$.93 Kuasazaawu mm"
 azmpzsavezaz

£'.3C{§ BUEENESE

 H Si.i§V¥ANG$3.§..A Bfliifii

--9'%i*J,./Q Hfi.F§?R;%§AD $A§...L5.E.
§GE§ Afifiiff" 35 YEARS

R2355? 6T%~E €?.GS§ 3&5 M253?
?.§e.3EN§RA EVAGAR
§;?%1§9'%§Gfis-«E

SEC E-£5335 WEFE



§Af'~.E€?~.AL€7}VRE_

SRE sq; smsxvgs ma
s/3 §.A"':"'E KESHAVA Rm

mam ASSET 33 YEARS

we 2-3;~§§ KSNEEEEWQ ;D5S"%"'
ua:.:@z-15?5:a2

Gm §QV"%'SER;VA§'%3'§"

SRE g SR§P§;THI ms

5:3 LA?E §<Es;~;Aa;A am

fi.GED Assn? 3: YEARS  
Na: 2*-1»§e Kumxzagwu-«--?es?  A
uaugz-sysmz   
ma Gew.§ERvAm*

5:»?! N swHA§v:AN: %H§3£s;t:?;V--%'* X 
wage SA'§"%-%ESH é-EEB-f3AP.'-"  _,  
A359 Asmar 2MEAjs:s' M _  '
GCC H§3%_%«$E£?v'I?E    %

fazmf gm f<A'7.«}.jG"f"7.§:'V"§'é.,E :22; gmgwszaw

am: ?LA':*_RE".,?'3';{Gl&R
'  A?P§i..§fi?%°€S

 - % (8»'§%~1%«:§:%_§' K§}§§3§'§"f&%?§.§§?§g§x?H ma

  :?R:5;1"~'§Q§ N KQTHAVE)

*§*H;%V%é;ATr4a TRIBUEAL mag:

., SE5'? 1.} $2.3 PI

$31 %'~%%§B$§.§ ?Q93ARY

 Ffiffi-iER'$ E'~éA?'*¥E NU?' §<NQW§'~i

TS TEE A;§PELi.fi:?\§TS

A§EQ %§A3GR

Rf ?*éEfi«.R NARRYANAGURU §Hfia}fi%,§'éA MANSER
KAKKUNJI

$i¥'§EVfii.i.E VILLAGE

233%}?! TQ  §,ESP§i'*§$EE"éTS

{S33 Sréa 8. VEERAPPA « §$E;'ERE¥§?»%E?€T AQ'2f§CA"§'E}



?HI$ WRIT APPEAL IS HLEQ UfS 4 SE THE
KARNAYAKA HIQH CCEURT ACT' FRAYING T0 SE'E",_ޣi".*T"%-'ESE
"ENE GRWEER PASSE§ IN THE WRIT FE'F'I'¥'Efi%'a3 ?%§$j.V4-=9"2;8}"5{}§8
3/IXTED 2?/S}/2908,   5 ._ 

This Writ Appeaé coming up fes" preiE:.2j §_::%Vagv%§?.T.::E3éaréfig.

on this day, SABHAHI"F'J., deiéveréé fhfi fc»--l;§ow%aiVg§:._ 

3ad'g:_sn§_:;t '   V

This writ a§$ea"§~..§_$ f§%Vi-1%15.914'§§'1e_'pe%:it§¢:'2e'::s Er: Writ
Petifiora Ns.4928f20G8 '5e_¥?§g? wéer fiataci
2285,2998 gsaésed  §e':a1'i";é'.{ed.V§.§f§:§jnx§§& Jasége of t%3§$
wart  men dismisseazé on
maritéfig as a%?éVI5  ad" §a Chas.

E!  fifeé by tféa amaeééafits harem

ceniersding ;:t:3,§_ 't§%e fiet§t§e;':ers are the iegaé %§e§rs a? me

 "?_,§ W55 had gene £21 adoption of Smi. U3,

  The said Smt. ELB. Saraswathamma Esaci

E53-t.§tutg_:'-zcé  C"'.$.f\£e.18§/64 and O.S.14S§6S in the Court sf

 fviggnsfiét Uéasgzai, Scasth Canara, far recavery 9? arreafis G'?

V."~..;*r'*s--as.;%§'%e:2ar:ca against Sm. LLB, Patta%?;%r'a:*::aza%2 fer Em

..,_.§.a§ear$ §§5.2-53, 5354 grad S465 raspe'€%%ase£3z. "§"h$ said

§u§%s were fiecreeé 323$ preéiménary ffétféfi wag ézawfs am

\,.?> .



 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Wi§é;'1A W 3143 Q
 231;£1A W 0-25  

3. The above said fancis ta sérz é§(t"esjt'._<3f-I1at2_¢futVV:'3:"a§:féé:

were said in favour of saié _U.B.*£=3faswath'a".m:m2£. ';S'27nt5.'=,

{L5, Saraswatharnma died  thé._V_pe:§.:§eVré1;3'}Wof the'

execution praceedEr2g;s'f 'a.;_2:i  L--?éj§:§z} is-..a:r;d a d'§p'*fied 39;: G.
Keshava Rag were reugfi'-3'i;_ #39:;'jé'écc:%



méswéng we apgiisatien fiéafi by Sré. ?a§ma ?is37a;"§ Er:

respect of the shave said §a:*sd. It is the f::rt§ae:;rj._;E§;$.éf§'ié:*§.%§?a"%;§f2

ef the getétéoreas that after passing cf the'?§rd.¢'rV.. 

Land "§'s'ibuz§aE, {ha said ?aéma ?;';§a7%E'd%«ed".,an.d'§V§'§§=s_$:"s--%j%*2é'r$ >

of {ate Pafima P:.2ja§'§ effecteé ..;;:fe'E;;L§rt.§:3els:.VV

amen; therzzsekxfas by 3 reg-§.§%:e§*e§ v.Parf:Et»%.§%;  %iaied 

24.1.1992

and Er: %%:e:”$§id §.a’%’tit.§Vj§5§%;V”‘i:3;._r§§ é?e:::»:m~:7s.ed $3 53:.
Nc.22§,/’é of Shévafié v§”§fl§’a§§_éV share 0? the
,2″ resp:3n<$<f2.::«it:..;a*;';d géégitisn came is be
flied by téfié for quashing ef the

erder:':,_pas3eza parfEEA§.§§:f2V’de;:e_2d sated 24.01.1992 En so far as it

e.f’;’vL:’ect$i”.L§§:;:s:”:i.:vAé’::-§_garz of the éaads is”: Survey Ns3.229;’6 cf Shhzaéié

.~,r§’% %g%gTe’;~ .’7€g.§V.§_a’A{3’v”éixtent sf 8 carats Er; favezzr sf resfieaéent

:’:§’.”2; Fujari as ifiegaé and mid.

“§”he Seamefi Smgée Euége after Ezeariag ihe

§:e:.a;s’:i’2§fi munsei agpearifig fer the aetiticners ané the

‘ V’ “”§éa:”ne§ High Ccurt fievernmerzt Pfeader appaaréng $13? the

1” raspofiderzt Land Trébunai b erder fiatafi 215.2888 has

,y.,..

aasseé an ordsaf an iderztiaaé facts flied 3;: the same
getiiéaréers which has been cenf§s’med $3; thés Cmgrt in

W.A.3Q91,!08 by msarata arder.

6. The éearaed Séagie hsfiga farther

aréar 3% the Tréfiasrsai was gagged;ss3.__3.3.Qé§3L4§*é:;» V§é2*: <_§? .€h+-e»=:.§ '

zwéi fiatiéion Es fiied ii'! 23% arid:*%';%2é_'_fia;f¥%a§e*'~f§:::§f:

29% %s gm': at a§% exmaéréed § e':%'i§§.ae%§ é«fe*~§.:,:5%? §§"'=.

daisy 353$ éaches w__%§%c%: j§":.a.§"vv:3s'%:,._ §éé'sa-._3aV:%Eé€act%ri%y
exaéaéneé afifi W§?€¥'&fG?Fa€' i?3A§§'.__3§'§'é §€i'eV*i,'j_c;~=:»éf%'i.*%t_§eé is any reiéef
Ea the writ peif?%:%gn z§%%:s'r%s§sse§ tha WEE:

§et£téé-5: Q3': 'v$5}e?*é~§…/__ass ms tha grmmé of fieiay am
Eaahes mgger fiafiéfi :2"i;?'b$';2…S§8.

8e§%é§…. :a§§’%%eved by 3Z?’§& said aide: gated

2;?.,;S.2_;:G§§s§–4<VA't–%%ve pezétismers Er: ma wrét yetitéerz fiava

" ;;*:%*é§;er%?5&§'_'§i%}Efiabgeai.

fiafifé fiearé tézé ieameé £$§..§§’ES€§ 3§§&3§”§%”%§ fer

5ti%%?é’«.._a§f3a§%a:’:€:s and the éaamefi §§%;e§’€:%”::a:’*si fxfiiffiiifiié

u;,§§§séa:*§§2g fsr we %’§$$@?%§&§3§ -wfitaie,

W3′

9. Learned cmmsei far the appeflarzts :*e;;’.:t_éj.a9:Va;”céjtiT..V’tv;*-zie

argamarsts made before the ieamed Sing:-%;:”

submétted that the deiay had bea§er:”s*a4i:is§f;2;{p%éir°:éd ‘

and petétieners were not ggfity of’;3:3Vei:2éAyA’énd §§A€:%:es«.

wafer passad by the Tr¥bur§Va-§.:C~anfeéférag ‘a.;:¢;spf’ésf§Véy’ fightsiw’

in favaur of Thammayyg KaA:2-n’a£§a’–s¥éaLs.’ errfleouéj ané was
Eiabie E0 be set asiée a’é’éci [_’;%’:é wage was :39:
justified in dé.vs:1j§s.t=.si:1g;:’At”?§ e’gr; the graamd sf
deiay and §.a::ji*:_e;s,:AA%:i’~;gf :5; ‘
€§®er’nVm~$nt Advocate argzsed $2’;

szspaoifi’ cf’ o_@fier passed by the warned

Singée 3ué’ggL ‘1

We ha£}ém g§ven carefué cansédaratém ta the

,_t{~Vgj:’.t”ér:§fj§’i:a§3s4v%'{2?{.i.~t%:e ieameci caamsa appearifag fer tha

Qartées a~;”:d{:¢;–<;'é'utizz§sefi the maiefiaé on recerd.

" 122'. The zantentiafis raised in the writ petfiéerz have

: negaiévefi by the Eeamefi Singée Sasfige Er; we

T "'§:%:3a.:§r:eé arfier dated 27;S.2SG8. The éeamed Sérggfe

Zéasdge has graceeded to dismisg the writ gaatétisn both an

merits as wefi as an the grmsrsd of éeéay am éatfies. The

M.

aementécna raisw by the apaefiants heyeér: wm were aése

the appeiéants in W.A.1Q§1;’2058 are édent§ta£vV.aT’s;2;§&T..the

§ear;2eé Singia Zfiuége by the same s’easmz§r*e§_;’ra§éct.é;§5

writ pezszien m “J%!.P.4928 3? was %b%;:%%f’1j¢:jdé:f

215.2908.

13* Fcfléowéng the reasgns aéiajgified

disposed of an 5.11.2898 wé’V?r:V>:{fi t_hatVth_e §”e-Vés 52$ merit $33
the contentiersss of t§:é4_”iveara’é$’:_%:vc:’§.§_;f1.§vé%..f<3r tV%§ e éppeiiants.
In the circumgtances sgéggfT':'A:i9 fimih"éI;w:vy'.'—reagen to dfifer

wéth $3? "x!4§e%«~$Vf:ta5¥§cé{3% _ie£amed Séngie gmége and 'cm

game fieéagféiit: #tu"§f:é'&*._f§'a*§%;%r;' arsy errar ar fiéagaiéty caéiéag fer

&€'§»?'~:.:§f"iv§é'ffé}?$fn};{i$' E§§__t__%3§5 appaai.

' we a§pea% is dégmégaaé.

Sd/-

Chief Justice

3d/-E

Judge;

Salk