Smt Gangamma W/O Late … vs The District Commissioner … on 21 August, 2008

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH UCOOIJRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH

i_:

EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALOR£OO:OO;O

DATED THIS wag 21" DAY OF AUGUST 2QQSg.fj~"%

BE E"'(}REZ

THE HON'ELE MR. JUSTICE D,v.sHYLE$nRA KEMAR'

WRIT PETITION No.7783/2oOs.fKLR~RR/SUE)°

aawwaaw

SMT GANGAMMA _ _ :"" .1 ,,_ .._
m/o LATE CHINNAF?%IRH *. a~' "gO«'«w;
AGED A$GUT 61,YEARé,; *' *. ;*'<
R/O RAYANAKALLU ;O "
MANCHENAHALLI_H®BLTg._ _ _ »-W»
GOWRIBIBANUR TfiL¥K.f, _'g_ ... PETITIONER

{BY Swrr s SQSQEELA} ADV.)

'fHE-misffirér'CQMMIséibN£R
CHIKKAEALQAPURODISTRICT
CHIKKAaAL;A2$Rg;,

"OTHE Assxsrkmiistmmzsszomam

'gACHICKKAALLAPUR gug DIVISION,
"*?£H:K§AEALLAPUR,

° TER;TAH§iLDAR
HOQGWRLBIDANUR TLAUK,

O GVWRIBIDANUR.

,a.;; 

"$33 REVENUE INSPECTOR

fMm@mmm&mJ;mmfi,

<:3OWRIE3I 3}'vX1'~JUR TALUK ,,



HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA H16!-I  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH 1

make

_3Or O§§ig° reaéon, _____ "the Writ Fe.'

notwithstandiag the present pmsitiQngV,WIn so

far as the order passed bVfithéTu§é$Utv

Commissioner being one_not_in*cdnSQnéfice=withW

the reasoning Given, Iii "is néfléfi Ot§7Othe'"

netitioner to appréaéh thé very authority and

point but the nflstaké and seék fab suitable

correctionLu $f:ié';béfi E0 the petitioner

F1'
1.

4
V4″

‘,4.
C?

:5
§..J
U)

diSmi$SEdfV’XV

rx:;V.V’ .