Karnataka High Court
Smt Hemavathi vs Smt K Mahadevamma on 3 November, 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 03"' DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. KUMARASWA:'II'§9'4':' * CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5259" OF 2BL1TOf} I BETWEEN: SMT HEMAVATHI MAJOR w/O.LATE SRI SRINIVASA R/AT NO.1006, 3"' MAIN ROAD 3"" BLOCK, HOSAKEREHALLI BANASHANKARI A zﬂ ; ~u._-_ BANGALORE »~»~ 560 085. I ._ --. ; '';,.PETITIONER (BY SR1: B N JAYADEVA, AD.vOcATE).A AND: A SMT K MAHADEVAf9'lMA_:."".r" " AGED ABOUT54 YEARS. I _ = W/O.LATE SRIVKARIYAPFY?.««T.. ' C/O.SRIGANES-H I ' U. R/AT OPPOSITE 'CAN ESH TEMPLE ROAD " NETHA3INAGAR,M';!.SOR.E. . ...RESPONDENT THISOCRIMINAL'-PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CODE OF..fcR.IMIINAI,_ PROCEDU~P.E' PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED '2_.I.9.2U10" PASSED BY V ADDL. I CIVIL JUDGE & IMFC, MYSORE, IN C.C_,NO.,6e7/2016, 'IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO IMPOSING CONDITION TO I-IIRNAISHFIONE SUREIT FOR €25,000/~. 'TF9-IIOSAACRIMINALI' PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION BEFORE "VITAE COURT TH___ES' DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:~ $2' QRDEIR This Criminal Petition is fiied under Section 482 of Code of Criminai Procedure praying to quash the order 21.9.2010 passed by v Addi. 1: cm: iudge & 3MFC, ~ C.C.No.607/2010,in so far as it reiates_.to~ to furnish one surety for $325,000/--. 2. Notice to respondent is 3. I have heard the iearned the"petiti.o§ner. 4. Section 439(1)(b) Procedure reads as under: :'fTh--at -C imposed by a Magistrate when 're~Ie_as.in'g".any person on bail be set aside _orvmbodi"f.ie'c'i." V'iinstantv"case, the petitioner has approached this 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure xvinsteadi of rn_ovi.njgdan application under Section 439(1)(b) of of Crirninai Procedure before the Court of Sessions. When't--hear"statute prescribes that if the condition prescribed M while granting bail is harsh, the petitioner has to move the Court of Sessions under Section 439(b) of Code of Criminal Procedure for modification. Instead of approaching the C0Vq'r't'V of Sessions, the petitioner has approached this there is specific remedy under the statute,.,_iri's~teadfoft" invoking the same, the petitioner approachi;n"g_,, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Prcaceclure if proper. In that view of the matter,i'i».this_Crim~ina'i --.i'>eti'1;i¢>ri is dismissed, with liberty tothe p.edtitio'neVr.i_f'to_ approach the Court of Sessions under prof Code of Criminal Procedure," 6. Offi.ce is aiirecjteiai tovrieturin-C the certified copy of the order of the trial,__Court', Memo is filed. .....