(By S'I~i;.P;I}i;G:g<i:;gI§i'1Id HCGP.) IN mi: HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BEN(_,'_.}_~i AI' DHARWAD : DATED Ti--IES mi: 28"' DAY OF JANUARY ,:" 13 ii 15' O R E THE HON'B.LE MR. .lUSTICIi~I CRL.P. NO. 7045/_2m"e_i'Ie BETWEEN: Srnt.Jabin W/0. Gani Jamadar' A, » Age: 35 years, Occ: HousehoA1Vd_v'w_ork__, L R/o. Laxmi--Nagar HiI3.d'a.1_aga_', " Dist: Belgaum. " (By Sri.Laxmikaiit--V..K;-.'C§_:t1ray?'«A';3'V'%i:§AEit€€9 AND: At T t i The State of Kar-nLa'taka'; V' By Camp Police B'eig'aune., Represente'(i'by,State' Rtivbiic Prosecutor, CiITI~;':'VIi'i.'£.A36-tlbha...aDh.ai~wad'.'" """ A' ' A ...Resp0ndent. This Petition is filed U/S.439 Cr.P.C. by the " 'adivi:--eate for the petitioner praying that this I~_Ion'ble Court may be Apieased to release the petitioner on baii in Camp a.C'-rimee' No.10?/2008 for the offences punishable "'~._"Li/iS__ec"s.5£)4, and 302 1'/W.S€C.34 of IPC. L_g~__f-..-\,__,.,... ...Petitioner. l'~.) This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: 7 ORDER
The accused No.2 in
Camp P.S. in Belgauan City has.»n’i’i._led ‘thel”preseen-tsioeititligoini
U/Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. This petitii_o”n_: .1; oippéjséd by the
prosecution by filing writtenoibjyeoytifonsi’to-i
2) Heard sides. Perused
the averments in:thefiolhniipla<i'r1ltjvvcaindothzer material placed on
record by the .lCioiii1't_Gloyern1nent Pleader.
3) Thelllicalse, of_lit”n,1e’v.l{o.1’osecution as alleged in the
co~I”nplain..t_j’ldated__0lll”i’#2..().09 filed by the complainant Gafur
Babu:3an§adar,_i’re’siydent of Belgaum, is as under:
a)–.fH viillie complainanfs second son Gani
deceased) was married to the “present
it yd”ii;;etbitfi’A::)ner–accused about 1.6 years ago. He was
i residing with the petitioner at Laxmi Nagar in
mBHeigau1n City. He was running Autorickshaw.
t,J’—
Ltd
b) The complainanfis said son and the
petitioner were quarrelling with each other.
The elder brother of the petitioner namel_y”””i’
Ahdul Latif (Accused No.1) used to interyelneg l
in the quarrels between the dec,e’asled’«an-.d
wife (Petitioner).
c) On 1/11/2009 at aeddt V
while the complainantqyvas iii” ‘house, lone./i
Nawaj came and inforinegcl (that);sio’ni:le.)i”q»uar1’el
was going on b.etvween”*’tli.e:j his
wife (petitioner of the
deceased. rushed
to the :re’siid’e.1)::;e oi)?”rails.,d’ecea’se’d'”:son and saw
that thetdecieaseidftifas.Lllysi:ng_;dead in his house
and his namely Rahil and
Muskgan s.wer’e”‘crying.’ The complainant came
i’to.Vl{1ioVi}’.”*fron:i his said grand children that on
ii’t_h’e_}p’reif’i«ou-slnight the deceased had picked up
quarrel wi’thj_ his wife (petitioner) and on the
gVmoi’n’ing”‘.(og’itliat day also he again picked up
,t;ua;:’__lfelllwith the petitioner and therefore the
e.rsa:id cihildren telephoned to the accused No.1
Latif (elder brother of the petitioner)
and informed about the said quarrel. Then the
(‘N-»f\”‘”””””‘*
said Abdul Latif came to the house of the
deceased and assaulted the deceased with _
knife on his chest. At that time the petitionezfwii i
instigated her brother saying that he
not leave the deceased, as she was fed*u..p7.wi1tli.:_”: ‘-
the ill-treatment given to her
result of the said assault il{n.i_fe,u
deceased sustained fatal ‘diediii *
4) The postmortem available
in the police deceased
was due to result of stab injury
to his chest. 16 years old, son
of the deceasiedland reveals that, on
the said mofsning itihe..:idVe’cieasiediiiheat the petitioner during. the
quarreil’ and therefore she asked him
::..,v(Rahi1i’)” .t_o-i’___teiIevi:ih,o_neV;’to accused No.I and inform the same
theni”‘the»–._’iace’used No.l came to the house of the
veandiiquestioned the deceased as to why he was
iii”i-it;e%at~i.r:gin’-Zhiisii wife (petitioner) again and again and after
ifvqueiistioning so he assaulted the deceased.
r~
5) Thus it is clear from the said statement that this
petitioner did not intend to cause death of the deceased.
Whether she shared common intention with the
No.1 of causing death of the deceased is
established by the prosecution during the ‘7
6) Having regard to the facts andcI’ircums’tan4c-esrot’
the case as aforesaid, I feel that thiie=.ein«.£s 0ifl’_§Ll:$lL.lC€ii§VVOUlCl
be met with, if the petitio’ne’i’_’is_ grain’t–e:d:i:ail subject to
certain conditions. I”I.e11-cve the”‘f0ll:’Qw’in”g.; V’
I
The presents..pietitiio.ni’fileiidll/Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. by the
pet,itionerV_’:’téihoi’is accu3ve.d…No.2 in Crime No.i07/2009 of
Carnp.—-City, is hereby aliowed. She shall be
don her furnishing a self bond for
“32,.-:Sv:v’4″‘Ql3′()()0/W aiflcing with one surety for the like sum to the
of the Cornrnittai Court and subject to
coridit.ions that:
a) she shaii not, directly or indirectiy,
tamper with the prosecution evidence nor sha1i_~,”‘ it
she threaten the prosecution witnesses.
b) she shali co-operate
during the investigation of this case_:’…_?
A copy of the operative poiit_i_Von,. of t’E~:iVs o_rCier”«shva1}–‘be
sent forthwith to the Co;.t.1.1rnitta_.1—–i:A.C–oi.’1–zCt coi”nCe.rn..:id for
information and compiiance.
_ppt§«MoSd/J
pw JUDGE
Mrk/- pppp ‘A . ..
