High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt. Jayalakshmamma vs The Karnataka State Board Of Wakfs on 2 December, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Smt. Jayalakshmamma vs The Karnataka State Board Of Wakfs on 2 December, 2010
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2010

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K. BHAKTHAvAfr§A1;;s;'  "' 
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.1946/201Q"(R1iS_3 .   _  1'
BETWEEN: I A A A A A A

I . Smtfiayalakshmamma,

Aged about 45 years.
W/0.Sri.Nagaraju &
D/0.1ate Marankaiah.

BEFORE

I Cross, Ranganathapura 

Kameikshipalya,
BaI1ga10re~79.

2. Smt.Kama1a,

Aged about Ti3E2--.y:é3;1rs," 51;  T'

W/o.S1'i.Mari_g0Wda 8; 

D/0.1ate Mar2:nkai,ah,.""   

R/a.Ittamaciu_ Village,
Bidadi Hobli, _ _
Ramanagatam Ta-luk" "

. "A.M.V N'arascgow'.d2"1v, ._

Aged about'  years,
S / 0' .-late? ' Mat'aV.t1--ka:1ah.

  R/a.Mancha~11é1A'_bele village

81 Post,"Maid«abaEa Hobli,

  Magadi 
A ' Rarrxanagara Dist.



Appellants 1 8: 2 are rep. by

their P.A.Holder 3*" Appellant.

.. .APPELLANTS

[By Sri.C.R.Subramar1ya, Adv.)

AND:

1.

The Karnataka State Board
of Wakfs,

Rep. by its

Chief Executive Officer,
Darul A wakf, No.6,
Cunningham Road,
Bangalore--52.

J amia Masjid,
Manchanabele village,  -- --_  . V
Rep. by its Secretary/President;   
Manchanabele village 8: pOSVt,_.  V
Magadi Taluk, A '  C ' '~

Ramanagara Tal?}lk.AA:;L}:'    ':'l..'.';RESPONDENTS

[By l\/Is.Crowl'1,ar   ~ 

Banga]ore__V1)ivis'i~o_n,Vl.l.Bangalore, dismissing the suit for declaration

M / s. Surajl' Law _Ass"o.r:iat.es;..  for C /R~ 2)

This; 'R.F.A V-.file'd' under Section 96 of CPC against the
Jfndgrneritldz Decree dated""1'9V.lO.2OlO passed in O.S.No.1/2010 on
 file' " of -the "Presiding Officer, Karnataka Wakf Tribunal,

7  pennarayent iiijunction.

  appeal coming on for orders, this day, the Court
 ' ''-..de.liyere.d_tl:e following: ~



3
JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellants admits thai as against

the impugned order, appeal is not maintainable.

2. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as V’

with liberty to take such course of remecly »avaiIab§ieV it

The Registry is directed to return nieeessalry papers”

appellants.

br1V*