High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt K G Indira vs Honkong & Shanghai Banking … on 22 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt K G Indira vs Honkong & Shanghai Banking … on 22 July, 2008
Author: N.Kumar
 % ' (sa&«:ata§1%wt:z!o9o0t'or« Hammad 

 mwmr a 133 ma
*5.) 3 I-Isvzaivm ma 5

vsmvmms mm
aasmm «mm 3%? RE
m-:mm'mWfi

mm mmim VWJ;VH'Wi 'a mi  
£33333

Gm xm1.L"v;*?1I€WE¥:§  % jffl  f  
stminw Immwne 99 fitgmgiram =  = k  

 "

wzrv ~ xczzvmw  '"¥'53fl} :§ 

smsmmlm      *  .    
v9~aaaw--:3.rwa 
H'mVRv'§¥AI--;Lnm'@(voa ,m*a1a§a'mz:
same V Ctfifif 5;» max .m*&,ax ."'4g&'=["'*».i,> 1iai'«.§.»"*.s.:"mT
 ';;%ssz~:v:mz*e  imraav
    h7VY*?Pfi«'VE¥aiiW%f3

   M11513 E2

   M '     
 L u'3T§?'{.}'v*HTi'IV.&I-I.Lf%E*J
5_fi"JC7&.!~fiS=?B'i flat: 'swan V flm

x 'V _ %%&9%{::za*~mva,2«x 'm ml .Lv.r"&:

    ' sm:*:a.r.. 99 Mmm army
Aiswtnavflmncm K H ma:

mum #3 ti ms E



 

% -' -' H    5E aaxzsnrwxnz mmzarx-1 mu

'3EICI!.rI'H8

T  96:25 ;.:mr= .50 Am was 31-13. sun, uanm

L%%%%%*3adwawa .Lv v:~»r'4;mmv:~1 ge 5.31360 Esme: 31-13. 23



/'xx

um!-"wdanaw flaw»:  an Rwvwrfimiv
mm mags-aznb 11'; msgmsd mg go uagsiamsscxfi image'; am;

zqtmq my 'gmg 'gag xamzw figxrwag gt; we-mung 

gt: ummmmuwg pine uagzusugmag mm W *$i.£:::¢§fl§1'W.mI 

am 12; wxeunmnb mg  ..z& mt; gm  

1.

1:; as-am; 3 aq cu; mgap amuagmgafi egg?»

a.xmxog:rf;:3.ad am. as; &

am axrxgsm oz; 1″£r£a-puadaax

.99 mm 3 -I03

m an 54 wsm~W1v«%
«Io; nomad mtwawma

L’ y _ K5E{(1I”EIGf
%%%% =mn1m’m:;..v§mm
azawaz Léiflififii-V3iEi.I;’ am am amwzm xwwswmm
iigw.-1 zqamnm Mm amt

% ‘iIé5<:w'Iv€:rzva *.z.ar;
“‘.’¥?3~.*33;€.&5,fi::;.~;¢j’,§ 2 V ‘

lnmfigm mF*& my
“W am away} % A A A
. .: .

an Wmzm

‘° ‘Wm an mg m. *a*£ww<n

R" w" A $3 "'3-Wmnaa
%%%*"'*'*'"""'*'*A **~'~*"fi§<i"'$..In

%§@"a

{ W mnmwfl 3
S n .

‘ . fix

M W
., ‘ , * n

in % »

[£9 119 $0 giwfi 5; I

‘””¥’-WWW rm 3
‘£9111 mfiqm ¢m

am .3?

3’39 ..

m 91:1 3% W%E_®%