Karnataka High Court
Smt.K.P.Chandrakala vs D.Hanumantharayappa on 30 November, 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE aoiw DAY 01:' NOVEMBER _V
PRESENT
THE', HONBLE MR. JUs'I'1er;-N¢ V
AND
THE HONBLE MR. JUS'1é::€:»i«:,' AITALI.
ccc NQ.553/V2.0VQ'9._(C--iyiI} T
BETWEEN V 7 ~ *
Smt.K P Chandrakala. _ V
Aged about 34£,y«*:ar~:-*., 1. 'V
W/0.Venkatachal.:L'"Shet'iy,'
Amruthur I~;1i0bIi';gx"V"" T
KunigaITaIuis, 1I;__ 3 V
Tumkur'Dis'u."i§£t. "if ..C0mpIaiI1ar1t
(By Sri Fv3ajannVa,-
AND:
._ T J V' D Harfiltlriiaantharai/apjpa,
ThC\S€CIE't.ap\y,A
'I{_QtIigéh Gfama Panchayath.
Kowdigehaiii,"_Am:ruthur Hobli,
Kuriigai T.a1uTR--, Tumkur District. ..Accused
(By Sri '.'l'vR:a_ia.rarn, AGA}
T CCC is filed under Sections 11 and 12 of
'-fC'0iit.empt of Courts Act, 197 1, praying to initiate
""vz:Qrz't.en1pt: proceedings against. the responcient./accused
'°*.a:1d punish him under the provisions of the contelnpt of
L... T
to
court Act, for disobedience of the order passed by this
Hon'b1e Court dated 17.4.2009 in W.P.No.11251/200.8.
This CCC coming on for orders this day,
passed the following:
ORDER
There is no representat:iori””on AL5)eh_a.’1:ftflofVV
complainant. Learned counsel for”the_accused’~subra’i’t.sx’*
that the accused, Sri D ‘no
more Secretary of Kod1g§.eha1}i””‘(}r§a;f{Vg;it. panéhaya€h_ Hg
ceased to be the Secreta1jf on transfer.
One Sri éri Naiz is the President Panchayath. In
those circunistances;”Vt’ne4petition is” dismissed reserving
liberty to the cornplainantet’o:fi1e a petition against the
persons. at therr;ton]ent are incharge of the Grama
RIDGE.
Ed,/3′
EUDGE