Smt K Sumithra vs State Of Karnataka Woman And Child … on 17 June, 2008

'(By gm

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, O

DATED THIS THE 17%! DAY OF    : 

BEFORE" I

THE HONBLE MR. JU,S_'I'ICi§2~._  J  

WRIT PETITION No'O1i2o9 O1={s;_   k
BETWEEN:    L  

1 SMTKSUMYPHRA -   
AGED 13013122  %  ~  O
W'/O SRi2_'N£§;§?AYANA$VVAMY  x 
R/0 KA;MMA:sé._Nm2A  O

   

KOLAR"I3IS'I'R:_' -  

. .. PEPFFIONER.

 REODY, ADV. )

s19A'rE~OIs* i{ARNATAI{A

 womm AND Omw DEVELOPMENT

 3 DEPARTMENT MULTIS'E'0REYED BUILDINGS

" '  DRAMBEDKR VEEDHI

BANGALORE - 560 001

    RI"-SP1' BY ;ITS SECRETARY

THE DIRECPOR

WOMAN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARIMENP
MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS

DR AMBEDKAR VEEDH]

BANGALORE --~ 560 00 1



3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

WOMAN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT  

DISTRICT OFFICE '  _ h
KOLAR  2 
4 THE ANGANAWADI WORKERS.
SELECTION COMMFITEE '
KOLAR TALUK ' 
KOLAR   D .
REP? BY rrs PRES_I_DEN'1'_.__.  
5 SMTRANASUYAMW; _     % '
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS  
w/0 SR1 NAGARAJAEAH; *  I D' 
KAMMASA_.;?«iDR3X va.LADD    .. 

  D  -
KOLLAR TALi3'§§«V.__"'VD     D
KOLAR    
k % X      REsPoNDEm*s.

 [By S1-ii  'REDDY FOR R5;
-.sR1j3I3A$rflD§-EAR KARAMADI HCGP FOR R1 T0 R4 )

  FHLED UNDER AR'I'ICLES 225 AND 227 OF

  CQNSTDDTION, PRAYINC} TO QUASH THE ORDER DT.
 21.4.2005; PASSED BY R3 VIDE ANNEx.D.

4:   'D D--IRE C'l' THE R3 AND R4 T0 SELECT AND APPDIM'
 'FHE'~.,_PE'l'I'1'I()NER AS ANGANAWADI womcm AT
  ___I{AM'MASANDRA ANGANAWADI CENTRE.

   THIS PETITION comm ON FOR PRELIMDIARY

  D 'iI EARIN-G m 13' GROUP THIS BAY, THE COURT MADE THE
  FOLLOWING:



The petitioner as we}!   
applications seeking app0intHi£§I§i~~..aS  at': L'
Kammasandra    hihevvpctitioner as
well as respodne-nt~--5     village and
have passed      that she had
secured   respondent-5 and

she belqngé” whereas respondent-5
belongs to the petitioner, pneference

is tone given >aӎxandidatc belonging to Scheduled

011%’ ‘W”r’1b has secured highar marks in the

2 is appointed as Anganawadi Workm;

V to the petitioner, is oonaary to the

% ‘ ‘gi1i<:1Ae1inéS…\ '
' V» V 'l"hc: subject matter of this Writ petition is covered by a

this court reported in I.L.R. 2008 Kar. 2282 (Smt.

Manjamma vs. State of Karnataka by its Secretary,

‘V Dept. of Women and Child Development, Bangalore), whcleinfl

/
1–K’

all appointments to the post of Anganawadi have

naught directing the Government to frame

and then appointments should be made.’ A H ‘

3. Following the said L’

stands allowed. The ‘at stands
quashed. Rule is issued

Mr. Pleader to tile

memo of

it .

Sd/~
Judge