Smt Kamalamma vs The Director ( A & Hr) on 1 July, 2009

 '{8_y 3;»;  ADV.)
 " 2.1' THE on::E'<:rc5R (A & HR}

     ENGINEER

 V "iéy sr; BQPRASHAKAR, Ami.)

._ 1 ..
I!!! me HIGH COURT or xnnmvmca AT amanxona
{DATED mzs THE :5' mt OF JULY, 2909
BEFORE _ A
THE HUMBLE MRJUSTICE SABDUL NAZEER. ~  jg,  

Emfififlé

1 sm KAMALAMMA
w/0 LATE NPARAMESHWARA
AGED AEDUT 44 vmas 
R/AT No.14,   5  
MUNINARASIMHAIAH GARQEN-.   ;
am ISTMAIN, BANGALORE.   '

2 SHOBA ,    ,    
D1OLATEN.PA§iA£9i;;{$HL5IARA[ ' '  * 
AGEE) Aacaujc"-28 gems '      »

3 KIRANJ? V *  '   

sxo LATE. N.? --. Vegawmg '- 

AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS. .. _

BOTH ARE Rim" No.1-4,  ~*

Muh;i§»w§As1MsJ.AA1AHGARDEN

a1?4a;'=" MAIN, BANGALORE  pswmoweas

KARMATAKA pawsa TRANSMISSION
V, "I<13.§iVERY EHAVAN,

aescom, SOWH oxvzszow,

_ __ SANASHANKARI ZND MAIN,
BANGN.ORE.  RESPGNDENTS

 



-3...

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that

1″ respondent will consider the said repraentation

accordance with law within a reasonabie time.

4. The submission of the learned

respondents is placed on record.

respondent to consider the repreee:ntationV’ at

in accordance with Saw within a’V.rpe§’it:d”‘of three—months
from the date of receipt of ‘It is hereby

clarified that this.’ ojr’o.er ggnmj. njotjf-t;eVV* unéerstood as

expressing.v’en§ op%s1n:o5tt.§n the matter in one
way or the other. V — V I» t a

writ. petition dés–po;<.;eo"of accordingly. No costs.

Sdl-E;

Iudge