{N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATE?) THIS THE 11% DAY OF DECEMBER, sorsé" ' " if *-
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR JUs*rIcE,A1N.1{Li:'gmé--TT» ' "
WRIT PETITION No.s137.;20tm(§M-cP<3--'%-'. " %
BETWEEN:
1.
am KGNFEWA KOM SHBEAPFA
SiCNE DECEASED. BY L.RIs L ” ‘ .
um sum s1~11vAP1?A; : s,I._o v;a’iii§AI%§~.a:’H£’i1L(;<3L:.'
AGE 71 YEARS, P,/c garb.' "i'E&CHER"AND' '~
AGREL, R/O s§;1x}GA<"a:+1;1_vD:sf£.,HswE:–R:…'VV .
1(3) s:»1TiJ.Ax§ASa i*<i;'V~:a=§(/V0 pRAg12aAH1'.
AGE 33 YEARS; are HCEUESEHQLD
R] O KOLI'-HAD
ms? DHARWAED ' _
1(0) SMT 1_.A$<M_;$.'v?vA, .9'/o"$i§:vAPPA HUILGOL
AGE 31f£'EA_RS, C[(1'§{OUSEHOLD
V' 153) "éf–IR:;:'.%p,Ap1GEPPA';S]o SHIVAPPA HUIGOL
'~._AGEL'«2§§ '1'EA§2i'a~,'vG._fC AGRECUIJFURAL
:{':-:1 "-T'$HRIv4§a4§NJfA?~PA SHIVAPPA HUIGOL
AGE} 25' YEARS; eye AGRICULTURAL
12. MS.4 ‘S.AVAKKA, D/O GADEGEPPA
BINDEJAGI AGE, 55 YEARS,
” = 2211:: HOUSEHOLQ,
.%1«T~TH.fa’P§”,*:’:’rzoNERs 1(0) TO 2(3) Am: 2
‘Am: THE RESIDENTS op saxcaaow
1’ vnzsw HAVERI. .. FETITIONERS
(BY SR1 l\f.P.VIVEKMEHTA, ADV.)
AND:
SMT MALLAVVA KOM
NEELAPPA BENAKANHALLI,
AGE 70 YEARS, O/C HOSUEHOLD
£3/IO cH1KxABEr~:9IGr:m,
TQ. SHOGGAON’, DIST HAVERI. ; ” = «.
.v.~;RPf;S1°0NI)E_N’i’ ~ ~ -_
{(8}: Sn’. VENKATESH R. BHAGAT, ADv;,._) ‘ I ‘ _
THIS PE’I’I’I’ION IS FILED UI+!BEi?14KI»2’I”it’3LES226:}&’I 2247» ‘V
01%’ THE CONSPPTUTIQN 0? INDIA _PR:;\YING~’§’Cv SET, A.€;I&§*.,f3″HE
ORDER 0?’ THE ADDL. CiVIL JU£3c31§{sR.D1~*;._h;aVE«’,R1′:_DATED
IO/1/2006 msssn on I.A.No.5 1»: O;$3..Nc«,41/98 AT ANNEXURE
E AND ALLOW THE 1.A.Ne.5.5ND
‘rr«::vsmfI}’1*i§1.c’):i~’i’ ‘oaba”PoR}PREuM1NAIzY HEARING
IN B GRQUP ‘rH:s..:;>5¥., frH4m’_:,VQI:12’r MADE TE-IE Fozwwznez
%
The héwchaxlenged in this writ petition
10/A re}ec’ ting their appiiywtfioa am
with Section 151 of the Code of civil’ ‘
stay of all further pmceedings in
‘««___G.s.No.41 [3i998 pending on the file of the Civil Judgc(Senior
2. Ningappa-8″! defendant has
G.S.No. 1 18/ 1%?) against the present piaintiff and ~ .
partition and separate possession of his 1e§”t1ma’
the suit schedule property. The sand’
as ().S.No.I21/1997. The suit
decreed. Aggrievtzd by the same, inépmseigt p§:tit:i£>j:gci;$vV,”Viivh€$
am defendants 1 to has;e””v p 1’ef£f:f;fcdh’
R.A.No.37/2005 and it is _
3. One Mallavva
has filed for partition and
separate Eacgitiinatc shame in the suit
schedule property in this suit
is ax-so” usubjcefitioners herein who are defendants 1 to
7 an application under Section 10 of the
-.’._”1o&e (if A are for stay of all further proceedings
” ” 9′ of R.A.No.31/200$. The sand” application is
by the trial cc-art on the gaunt} that the present
a 016. case. It is at the stage: of evidence of the
V,
plaintifi’. The plaintifi’ is not (mum-examined.
because in respect of the very same property, anothe1f”s1§i’§.e__i VI’ ‘4
filed, no ground is made out for staying of 1 —
pmceedings in the suit. Being j_
petitioners are before this Court. _
4. When the subjti::<:t'_ me:'t fe:" . éeit is
the subject matter of the when both
the suits are for and that
an appeal filed Jié qaestion. of the trial
Court fi;;~».. fgarfition between the
game perse'r:_1e first place the present suit
is not filed of time. The present suit is.
1$V'9'98.a;§;§i,the earlier suit is filed in the year
lssuev in the suit is also the issue invoked in
' % the the court can grant the relief sought
V for by
' In that View of the matter all the ingredients of
VT 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure are eatis&d and
V
therefom the trial Court should have stayed its
pending disposal of R.A.No.37/2005. In that .
matter, the impugned order cannot bcM§;1staineti.v' -. .fI§i«1ei3.<.:c; _I u
pass the following 01:16:':
6. The Writ Petition is t”r1ie’5izap5azgned
onder is set aside. Suit _Ti§s,gtaycci iacnding
disposalofR.A.No.37/200$” ‘b ” %’
kmv