Smt M B Gangamma vs Shanthamma on 11 January, 2010

U1'

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 11" DAY or JANUARY 20,1.-Q

BEFORE

THE HON_'Bi,E MR.JUSTvI-CE RAVIRMAJLIMIEVHV  V

REGULAR SECOND .Ar>_r>EAi_'zesgmffgaoé; 

BETWEEN:

. SmtrMv.B..'Gan§.'5rnrTTa' «. V' 
D/0"'!3tAej:'Ma'fi§d'§- B'as'a-spa 
Aged .abo.ut,_4"jy'e.ar5.,__ -- '

  
D/0 late 'Mandi '.'3asa'ppa

; 'Aged abou}:"42 years.

. 

TAD/yoiate ‘Mandi Basappa
A’gedV’_ab”Qu’t 40 years.

M,.5B.fih’ar1na Reddy

S/0; late Mandi Basappa
Aged about 38 years.

.-AR”‘M.B.Subhash

S/o late Mandi Basappa
Aged about 36 years.

M.C.Thippeswamy
S/0 Mandi Basappa

H3″ema%’nna

Aged about 58 years.

7′. EVI.T.Ningappa @ M.T.Ningann

S/o Mandi Timmanna
Aged about 58 years. V

All are Agriculturists by profe_ssion”,._
Residing at Chikkagondanah_a§’%i., ‘
Chitradurga Taiuk @ Distréct.*«_’ _ ‘– f;

-. ” …APPELi;ANTS

(By Sri B.M.Siddappa’,’ ‘A_d”yoc,aii1té;- ~51/’§b.s’erI”t)..

1. Shanttjaafirrja ‘ ‘
\’.V/oavTE_r’n.ma’rE:r;za ” _
Aged _abo._u1t..__69V%year’f-..<_ . '

2. SHa._rji<ayra'p~;3a
S/o Timmanna
E» Aggged abooVt'4'5 years.

' " -. . S/.0' ~Tn'mrh–a n n a

V An/3\v§_]4E:i"{'[EEj.'3Ati3.ltEvi§ 45 years.

Nag'a.ri.}'1a

gr}

S/o._TEmmanna
Aged about 37 years.

.:Reddy
S/o Timmanna
Aged about 37 years.

AH are Residing at
Chikkagondanahalié,

031:’

Chitradurga Taluk 8: District.

6. G.Thippamma
Age: Major,
R/at Devanahalii, ‘

Chailakere (Taluk). ‘” …REsPioaio:%’refrts._VV

(By Sri M.V.Hiremath, Adti/o._c§’a’t.e for””R,1-9,5)’-t_:

This RSA fiiedA…ur1d.er’.sectEo’r1V1-00″CPC against the
Judgment and.._ Decree’, da”te’d.._ ‘1:i~.9.2005 passed in
R.A.NO.236/2CiD’OV on the’ fiI_eA._oi” ‘t’E”:*e” II Addl. Civil Judge
(Sr.Dn.);Chit._ra”d-d’rg’a«,._A_|Iowi’ri_g’*t’he_ appeai and setting aside
the Judg.rne.ht_ and 4D”e.f;ree”‘ida’t;:ed 23.10.2000 passed in
os.:\:os;s58g9;f.19’92,«onstne fi|’e”ef’the Pri.Civi| iudge (Jr.Dn.)
Chit_radurg’a;,_-. -. ‘

A’T_hi’s_ for orders this day, the court
deliveredtrae foEiow_ing._:I>~

EUDGMENT

i§i’_QheV~i.:;’a”opears for the appeliahts, even though the

rfiatter. was cailed on two occasions. The appeal is

0 is dismvissed for howprosecution.

355;

£3»: égé

Rsk/–