IH Tfl men COURT OF KARHATAKA AT
DATED THIS TEE 1015 DAY' or Q n J
mwsmm
rm Hownw am. ms-rxcs ;'
H.F.A. no.s449gg_o'a4_+g_@ %
BETWEEN:
1..
EMT. M. BHAGY_a_y~._ 5
W/0 LATE K.V. PAPA;\I;?s¥5£3HARI V
AGE; 27 YEARS, %Qc"c,-_ E--IOUSEHOLD
R/AT KU§gREGL:NDIm1,mjQ.E % "
KAsBA;Hc1;BLI, IG§ADl3iUR"'EALUI{--»~"
MA]§{I3?'{A.'_I}£ST£'REg~_}-E?" A
Gifilsiaw % %
3,10 LATEKV. 'PAP.4'§RNACHARI
AGE: 9 YEARS; MINQR
; M ;<:,1=. Rhsfimi
~ D10 PAPANNACHARI
Af KYEARS, MINOR
gaépfiigmrs 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS
~ R/B'¥7jNf£TURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER
A APPELLANT No.1
............._.:.--
1.
,R';AT KUDREGUNDI VILLAGE. KASBA HOBLI
1*¢I.3§£I)DUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
APPELLANTS
(13? S121 ; G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY -- ADVOCATE)
SR1. K.S. RAMALINGAIAH
S/O SHIVALINGAIAH
AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER
E/'"
30 The u31t§
mdia msurance
Ccmgzany Ltc'i.,
Mace Rfiad, Mandya'
REP. by its Branch
Managera
(R-3 added V ids
Court. oxdez.
dhteel 20. 1 .09)
99%'?
23.3. to I-ion'b}.e (tags;
«-fzfim C:0U'RT THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE ~
01:' LORRY NCLKA 11/1139
R/AT 0PP.I{MF DAIRY, GEJJAIAGER1_3{F€)'ST__: ~ A.
MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, =
SRI.SHjIVALIR'GA1AH _
S/O NAGARAKERE LINGMAHH :
MANA€}ING DIRECTOR
ws. VAIDYANATHESHWAE?.A'*». '
TABLE MOULDED Bamzcs Il*$=DUSTli'.IE£~}_"«-V
KUDREGUNDI, R/AT '€)?i7'. KM? 9512*-.1'
GEJJALAGERE POST,____MA_DD_UR TALUK
MANDYA DIs%m.:CT. '; 'X 'X
AARESPONDENTS
(av SR1 : A.M..VVENKATE.S’H-‘– A1)v£3icA;rELFoR R3
R1 -:R«:}.D §.SPEN$EE)) u
THIS Mm FIL_ED”‘U;S 173(1) OF Mv ACT AGAINST
mEv~JU”DN)’ Ami) 1.’vIAf71′.«..MAI}DUR, PARTLY ALLGWING THE
CLAIM =.PETI’I’ION* FOR._ COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT’ OF, CC}’MPENSA’I’!ON.
;»’fI§E~{E.S Mi5’A””€OMING are FOR HEARING BEFORE
A E_o1..L’Qf;\r:N(3::;
JUDGNEHT
z is a miscellaneous first appeal filed under
‘VS,c§tion 173(1) of the Motor Véhicie Act against the
___§Judgm?:nt and. award dated 06.02.2004 passed in
M.V.C.No.2’7/G002 0:: the fik: cf Civil Judge [Sr.Dn) fir.
Maddur partly ailowing the claim petition for
compensation and seeking enixaxlcsmexltjdé’ 33$
compensation
2. Parties will be referfezd
the claims Tribunal.
3. Heard ref’ the “sppellants
and Learned counsel 3. Learned
counsel for absent.
4. in the Tribunal is as --. " about 9 pm. the deceased
K.V.§’a9Aams2ehafi”‘Wss towards Basavanapura
.’ V. toV’rs.a(§}i:* he was proceeding to his muse
the M.C.Road, mar Sugarcane crusher
of a lorry bearing No.KA–l1/1139 came
and negligent manner from Gsjjaiagere and hit
the deceased, a result of which he died on the
__s_;5ot. Deceased was 33 years old and his occupation was
carpentry work and in addition to that he was doing
U,
been filed against the driver of the lorry. Th1:..s’44’
evidence of PW-2 and also relying on
evidence, the Tribuzzal has come”te “a’ ctoizeltxefit;
accident eeeurned due to the rasl3i’aiid_
the driver of the lorry. F1’nd”vi’1:1″g,re!eLti:1;;”‘fizojenegfiéerfice is A
based on oral and doeumefitafyj part of
evidence is sound and ”
7*. income of the deceased post Inorfem report is 33 years. The Tribunal
has a1V)’A;;1)1ui;eilV1ES~~…Ii1ée%.i5i¢c§.:_;5}’1?Vefr; “The Tribunal has awarded a
com;:ensatie1e:. “oi’ Rs:2,16,0(}0/- towards loss of
In to this Tribunal has awarded
Vizoerards loss of consortium. Rs.3,000/_
expenses. In all Tribunal has awarded
1gg.2,24~,_eoo/–
— 8. Aggrieved by the same, the appellants have
T ” hmereferreci this appeal seeking for enhancement of the
compensation.
E/’
10. The record discloses that the apm=:_Va£i~:”
dismissed for default on 10.08.2007 and V’ ‘
restored on 06.09.2007. This pQri0d._i$ “‘
Therefere, the question of non¥:awa rt1ing1*._th€x’ iIi£i’=;:zre”si€:_’
during this period may “Re§~9.t of
accepted.
1 1. In View of the’ 1 pass the
following» ‘ ”
in
by enhanced from
i \ R$’.’2,24,csao;’.- gig awarded by the Tribunal
‘ ‘ E .fi5._Rs.3’,’35__.QG0/-.
compensafion will bear
‘ at 6% 9.41. from the date of
_ .’;${i1ufii,{§ion an the date of realisation of the
.. éfimpensafion amount
Wei): The other part of the award is confirmed.
e) Modify the award accerdingly.
Sd/’E
Iudqe