11: mm; HIGH mom or KARIIATAKA,
DATED mas ms 6th DAY 03* APRIL ' j[j: "'
BEFORE
THE noxmm ma. JUSTICE "a'n"n§D?[;-T
wan' mmnor: 110.2639-.___ pr 1, :2 '
BETWEEN
SM'? MUNIAKKAYAMMA " _T
we LATE V RAMAKR£SHANAvPP_A
AGED ABOUT 574'{ERAs,g "
R/O BUS_STFAND"R0:Ap, _ '- "
VIJAYAPURATQWN 562
DEvANA*HALL:TAw;<;%? % % %
BANGALO--TRE.RURAL ms'rR'i<:jI:..
- K! ' PETITIONER
_ (By ms. ;RAMA 35 ASSGCIATES )
1- ' -.'1'HE~CH_1E§" OFFICER
' ._f1'0m~z MUNICEPAL
'vI.;AYAPuRA TOWN 562 135,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
THE ASST. EX. ENGINEER(ELECL)
Unrm, BESCOM,
VIJAYAPURA 562 135,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICI'.
3 THE UNDER SECRETARY
MUNICIPAL ADMINSFRATION DEPT,
M.S.BUfLDING,
VIDHANA VEEDHI
BANGALORE 1.
4 THE CHAIRMAN
BESCOM,
K.R.CIRCLE,
BANGALORE 1.
5 THE camp SECRETARY _ .
GOVERNMENT OF' KA.RNATAKA;._ .
VIDHANA SOUDHA," '-- L .. '-
DRAMBEDKAR VEEDPE1 5 '
BANGALORE'-1_. -- " . 1
' RESPONDENTS
(By Sri: H 3 NAMYAN, .A'm.r AFGRV-R1' )
(BY 312;. 3; j; @1313?-A;,.,,Anv"FoR*-R2 85 ea)
(BY SRI. R DEVADASIL} AGAFOR R5)"
THIS WRIT .PETI'TlO«N 21$ FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 UP' THEV"CONSF.lT_UTION OF lNDiA PRAYING TO
DIRECT 'FHE""R1'TO._RENE--W THE LICENCE GRANTED AS
PER PLAN ANDVSTAY THE OPERATION OF ANX--L, EYE'.
- 2%1~1?%%@6,8ND E'I'<'.»-% « «
' TH'I.S"PE?1;i'iTION, COMING ON FOR PRLHEARING m
'B'. e.RQ'U?;~.r1fH1fs-BAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING
ORDER
x j “I’l§c._f3etitioner proposed to erect a 1st floor over the
VA gonad floor, of the premises and obtained a
j 3g;;iction of building plan fiom the lat mspondent. It is the
Uassertion of the petitioner as the gonad floor was not
capable of taking the load of the 1st floor, the petitioner
Mi
erected cement concrete pillars from the _«
support the 1st floor, though Dis , t’1§:¥;
forthcoming from the sanction of ” ‘ n K
2. The petitioner alleging mfipévhdézgt was
not justified in issuing «datcdH§1″.n1.2006,
Azmexure L, dimcting the up further
conshuction, has pggfcnéd rm:-; pe£ifiL;:n.,fq;{i (a) a direction
to renew the quash Annexun:-L
endorsezficni ‘viii diiection to the 211.:
respondcfit uto supply to the pcfitionefs
bu:ildiI;g;_ (c) respondents not to meddle
‘V Vwiitb. award costs of the petition.
_ tiiic pendency of this petition, by order
_dated””–2.5–,’2{}0’:? Anncxures L and M Wen: stayed, pursuant
counsel for the 21″‘ respondent submits,
power supply was restored to the petitioner’s
»?m.1’Li§ding. According to the learned counsel for the 1st
~ « iespondt:n!: though the building was Enoompletc on the
date of endorsement Annexure L, nevert]:1ck:s$, thereafter
H
directed tr: consider the same, pass orders thereofi afl-ti: H
action, in accordance with law. In tt’;e””e’vcz1t, t;he_.
found to be tmauthofizcd, 1iberty “is
respondent to disconnect the sfiiipljr of
unauthorized consfiuction.
The pefiniog; ‘e;;;.:~.;:1:1:ng1y; ” ‘
5d/–
A ‘ Iudge
csg