IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 131% DAY 01:’ MARQ1 2009 % T i
BEFORE
THE HONBLE Mr. Jusrrm 13;sJ;:-u.«.’m:.%& % Vk
WRIT PE’I’I’I’1ON No.g314 oz? % % 2 % X T
BETWEEN:
I. Smt.Munimuddam:ma.,
W/o Late Clfiklcamuniyaijpa, -_
Aged about 70 years ‘
S/o Late C1fik1:;£é_;I11.;;1i3g’appa,’;__ ‘
Aged about 5? >
3. Sri Nanappa; L
S/0 Late %
Aged abo1i¥.48 _
_S/0 Latjg: Chikkamuniyappa,
Aged a:b”oujt,40 “””
‘ Hobli,” A
DeVana.’naih[Taluk,
% % M L % ‘«B_£mgalor7ev.1?£m’al
” ‘Dis1f1’iCt, …PE’I’I’I’DNER8
,_,, A U n A.’ ~ ‘ ‘ ‘_’ Jéifikatesh Murthy, Adwcatc)
1:. Smt.Mnmy’ amma,
W/0 Late Munikrishrmppa,
Aged about 70 years.
on the tile of Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.),
being disposm of along with
L o.s.%No.a93,*m* by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Devanamni
rejected by the Principal Civil Judge,
Rural msu-ict, Bangazom. mieved by the
T this writ petition is filed.
2. Smtjvluniyamma,
W/0 D.V.Vcnkataramanappa,
Aged about 52 years.
Both are residing at
Anighatzta Village, V ‘
Kasaba Hobli, ‘” V
Dcvanahal1iTa1uk, ‘
Bangalore Rural District. T.
This WP is filed under A’14;;iC}es 226. _a’11d-I 227 of the
Constitution of India praying to jtiircict to ca1!.fo;:’records
in Mis.No.64/O8 on thefilc (5ft1_ie’ffr1.DisL and Sessions
Judge, Bangalore Rmnél “Dist, jémd A.quash impugled
order dated 18. 1 1.2008, /-38,’ Anncxure«-
G and to gent’ _su__ch e_)thé’:= }m_Iiefj–a_.s this’ Hozfblc Court
deems fit to the eifituinstaficcs of the case and
allow the
Th_mTwpj%%4c§ming%fin” f§r~p:~e§n°mm° my hes:-kg this
day, thaf: %ti1c_’f:;§lo_v¢iI1g: .
‘A E R
‘Prayer” petitioner seeking transfer of
4
petitioners herein have chosen to tile this suit nearly
after three years from the date 0.S.No.40/05 was
instituted.
4. There is justification for izhe
the Court below that the appiieatiofi 13′ L’
attempt to protract the T.f.;1)e_,fpetitioI1
being devoid or merits §iisn:;iss¢a;%e*ekl’A . _
* A §5J’?:.
e €115.99
e