High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt N A Hemavathi vs Sri H B Sudhir S/Oh S Basavarajappa on 30 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt N A Hemavathi vs Sri H B Sudhir S/Oh S Basavarajappa on 30 June, 2008
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda


IN THE HIGH CUURT OF KARHATMCA, BARGEEORE
DATED ‘I’fi’I3 THE 39″ DAY OF June 2003
BEFORE

hm mamas rm. auswxcn A.u.vmt§¢er¥§gLg * V V

In» no ‘I369 or 2006 ,<m—c£*c:)"-._

azwwsm *

1 sm at A mmmm:

M4313 ABOUT 3:: YEARS,
11fD.li.H.3\l!iA!i’I’I-IR!§.EDDY’–.._ _ __
m’..!..m.66a, 1411! mass i
141′!-E:M&I!~I.. J P,_l*i3£’aAR…1I_2’£’IP:8E_
amazon—56:;..o’ra I ‘~ _

2 ma p.,sm::u-.n…’;’-_ ‘ __
AIS-EB 1i-=»._Vnaz;’1’: 32″¥£_m’s A1 .5

RJA. Ha; 5&8 ,. ‘}MTH’ » amass.
14m ~.’!\iA1£fl,.= ‘j.;f_ IP11 9:-ms:
Bnfi$A£.OR£—e56€_.t~ mg . _

– .« V ” PETITICNER3
(By 521 -:%::: – adv.)

T35R14 aunmn 510 H S nssmmmm
* mns::.,32.jx3nns, B..fA.N0..33,
KRIJPA. zmmxnummnonn
Jammmn, nmsanom-46

” 5.-‘u.r.:m.unnrrn
_ imzn Mom’ 54 mas
“m’A.aonna1>Awa Human
L snxaansam-run 1-q
_m::n’a=v.. nwrnrcw

3 C ammo
31’O.CHA!iNAPP}\
A1383. 54 mas

WA. DGDWQAEYA VI LEPLGE
SR3 RANGAPATKR TQ
FIHNDYR DI STRICT

G V CI’£’i!*IDRPa8HEKPLR

sxo.s.T.vnHxnmAsw3uv R£Dn$T% ‘
313833305’? SIYBARS ;

auuaun. VIA, vznraun, nAneanqn3é5éQ§af-‘*faxa~7

A.ANNAflfiHAP2A . -_
MAJOR (E83 140′!’ KNOWN)
3,-‘o.um: R A smcxmsnshszm,
n;a.mnw Tairnaaannaa _~.” r
BANGALORE sou-mv ‘J’::.’A. ”

BANGALORB~56O o3$»JH’:

sio.s.1c1=:1sr§;¢:«a1=-1=;~.’& _’ ”
nn3on{a:;s4..m:v:*’;–_V1am1:g1)—._ »
Cf0.H6fiI§HEMAP?A,’J’fi” ‘ g

I-‘roonx- j1r’i.L;.:.n£33,_ §:_.’a_,mnmH_HoaL:£
az:.tec:nLcn1i_ sczzimwg, nmsananw-560 837

:2:
Aszn=33ouT’3ovvEa§s
Sm. nanny

R}’3\..!<I.J!4n?i.£.3!§iALL3Z v.n.m:x
Qjfi R_?3REM H6%h~'

aafigmasmmunz ros-r

' ~fiEfl§&§03E+56O 037

. h fiiinnv
'aHmgua,;unan1 vxnuasz

3:; xrunm 11031.1
BFQGRDORE SOUTH TPLLUK

'" =,gAncnLonx~saeoav

V""fi A xnvxraa

D!'0.l'3l H fiflflflflm RIDHY

N333 ABOUT 30 YIPLR3

80.653, 14?}! CROSS, 14??! HAIR

J 1'' H5633 ZED PHASE

fiPING1":{:0!\E–550073 …. RES?ONl3EN'I'3

..u._.n_..nn.nu Ir\ sup-u-s–u.u¢.'\u..s uuwuuuuuu _I('\ l\Inr\"\ LIIXILI \~f\fl-!'l\-Al)I-IV …!r\ l)lnfi

3

$33? Sffi 1 T HEBBRR *- Ami’. FOR R7 5. 3;
M§’i..I{MF:}3sN PAS”!-IR & CG. FQR R1 & 4)

*I”£-5’15 1!’? FILE13 PBAYING TD QUASH THE QB.nT_R I21′.
1T.3.Qfi an IA UNQER 03933 1 Runs 10 05 THE csc Ifl
GS.Nfl,4?42f2$0G BY THE coma? GF ‘TEE t_XYII
AflnITIflflAL czvv czvxn JHUGE, BANGALQRE»jC$H%15)
VZDE .AnN-E IN so any .A$ THE REJE$TIQB “OF_ THE

PREYER wax Inynannxma Tflfi as A5 8Tfl @EF$fl9AHT”IS ,
CCIHCERNEE ENE} EELS?! THE SPsI»3}.._4A9E’LICP-.”?–1flNV’ “‘.Iv’HE.
PETITIOflERS IN ERTIRET¥ om DIRE€TflTfl’IM?fiEAn_THEVa

as 33 avg aarzannmw “.1x = THE. .$A1D a EUIT
a3.4?42!2aG%. I ‘– * “‘ ‘=’* ‘

TEES REIT PETITIGH tafixxs fin ‘EQR;x?§ELiMInAnY
HEARNIG EH E EERQUP ‘PI-§IS*._E3fis\.’:’ THE’ JZIOURT} MADE ‘FEE
FGDLGRING : v»_ ,~” * ‘~ “~~~

learned maunsal
fw: .1:l*’;4s §I5?’£”h:;L.”t’.:7″J;(i}:lL”.’.!B V§V?.f5:’,.|fi.-~ after arguing the matter

fax ,}:’irfi§:_;”~~’:aubmittrad that, the writ

max;y”‘b’e’V;3ez:m’ttad tea has withdrawn with

the yetitianaxa anti 1319 9″

‘*;?s.»5p;:»;i§i’$:i’t hazein to raise a grmund in tha

appéal with regard tn: the ixnpimading or

. ¢»”‘:;f«he.~:rw:i$e of the’: preagmaed 8″‘ defendant i.e.

the 8″” ,2:-naspamienf: hernia, in aasva, tha result

mi the: suit is agaimt the plaintiffa.

\/.

E. S:i.Pr:«a3w.ah ‘I’. Hebbar, leazned caunml
far xvaapandent N13. ‘3 3ma,=s nan: been ahla show)

as tun why’ auch liberty ahoulci not

3. IE find fcarcm in tmt_gubrt:iéVé;i.§}n””m§;c:avL._}$y_

the leazznad czaunsel fad. tI 1_é~’Ipétiti’u:iav§f;3 1vé§nd ‘

hance; the writ peti.§;’i.s:;n ii? 1;~e31f§:1iié._i:&e~=::i. ‘ta

witm~1x:awn,with 3.ihart_y :A’3:».aix;g 2éém3_;::%.ijé§ci tc: the

g: at it imne 2:3 ; as as ‘:53.-t f§a13a¢%3*Vég’9″%
>;sa:::z.t;”;.g§e:t;iit1:aa~z~’ {sf’:&ne:;.:-:7 disposed of