Smt N Rajeshwari vs The Authorised Officer on 30 April, 2009

3&3'-H fl

 ._   ._W..........m. -naww'-QWUK-I' -us mmmmm film!-'l"tf¥';'i.'1?'l.'?f5'§"£"f' my mama 'z~&':lG":-i icouétbé téafmzmaazmlé

BI THE mam scum' OF' KARMTAKA AT BANGA1.C:.~RE %
mrmnns THE saw my 0? APRIL 2:21:39 % j I"-%%  %

WFGRE

Tm Hmmz N£R.JUS'1'Im H.H=I'V?$'1flfiMG'HAK.4' M      A

BETWEEN :

$HT.IvT.RAJmHMsRI
W}0B.'r.1~IAGARAJ
AGEDABOU'i'54YE&R8 V
D10 8.    V
R1Ar1?2,KEmH:Ams._PET' "  %  ~ 
  _ 

  'V  "   A
BANGALORE    ;'.PE'IT1'IONER

  FOR
     

1.

THE .5r..r#mom:a~} $3′ mkizfiié
“CITE?-HAR3iET..BRANGH

2. aiafionmv

AVEHEIE R.Q:s;:<::2os5

kmpamsvns mmi

V . mrmnmaacam
3.5. J. 32?:

“’73{}3fi’ 0?3m8.

‘A may mes, A%’mKE
maaarwcrzms
” x BAH U32.

..fifl0%N”TS
{BY;M1 $. PRABHU &DAVE, FQR R–1]

0km

‘I9″fl mmmaunwmnm mmrn mwmml Mr KRMNRKAKA HIQH QQURV fll” KARMKEAKA HEQH CQURT Q? %fi.RNkTAl(A H-ifififi a

T315 WRIT PETITION $ FILED UNEER ARTICLES 2?6
AND 52$’? OF T% GG GN OF’ mm,
SET ASIDE THE GRIJER £1.A.’I”£3E! 3.3.2ID09

m.No.2547;2ooa IN m nawaaizoos BY V.
Rmmvmy TREUHAL, BANGALORE, vmh’: ‘
Am) CQNBEQUEHTIALLY ALLOW THE ‘.m.._j
Rc:.254*:*,*2oc:s IN H2 H0. zosefzccs 93 0?
DEB’? Rmovmxv TREUHAI. AT B&1’3’GA£f’1!_R.E Am m5::,; =

mm WRET mmon comzcamw dmfiaa

DAY, mm coum’ mum “rm empxawma: A
‘ , gait pafling
hmmumzamgnaummnamagae5§p@mg§gka&2ands.
The aubjacf; cg: in this
petififl” the pmn-.m’ ‘ suit
pamfimmfiua§sa¢§bw§§:g¢cnmLamuz

; m’%~2y$ gamma Civil Caurt, whm’ is alrcdy

the abaw obam’vma’ 13% the petm’ ‘ :1 is

M% ,sfifimm&a@E

Sd/–

Judge

.W%A.o1fl(v.urnm rt: