Smt Nagamma W/O Late D Devaiah vs The Deputy Commissioner Mandya … on 3 June, 2008

2

IN THE HIGH comm' op' KARNATAKA, BANG;i?;'i;;--0§:E:)'.   ~

DATED 'I'HiS THE 03% DAY QF..1t}NE--'2{)()é    

BEFORE é Q % A  
THE HONBLE MR.JUS'TIC1E AV"Sv.'f3firGPAI€f§}§.i._:v«--v :3
REVIEW P:«:'rmoN   
BETWEEN:    

SM'? NAGAMMA W/0' LATE D..:)E'vAiA_H." " 
AGEDABOU'I"?OYEARS    

em CROSS, SJDQAKTHA N.'*%=_GA.='R""  _  
MAI..AvALLi's'0_wN  *1; =  _    .

MANDYA DIS'I"i¥IC'?'~V'  .      FETITIONER'

{BY BLACK'COA7fSi,LA§3fi,;i*'IR'I~!,;P.DVS)"""" 
AND: V' '  "   '"

1 THE DEEIJT? {i0m§11se?§it3NER
1\§A1;~¢;;>YA f)I,$'t"E3.ICT, 'matszma

 '~  2 -'%§HE;3fA;-EASILISAR --- ~ "
 MAI.F.3r'A_LLI._TALUK
A . 'm.Law,LL.;,'MANDYA DISTRIC?

3 3:21 somsimmn
-$10 1,mfEj..-- KEMPARUGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
 5'm_c':2oss, SIDDARTHA NAGAR
AA . miAVALL1 TOWN
V MANDYA £>isTRm'_  RESPONDENTS

_ “‘{BY .?:§RI NARAYANAPPA, (30 .ADV. FOR R: AND R2 arm SR1 :<:

jj v’1!.,N!%RASIMHAN, ADV FOR )

‘0

ceunsel for the petitioner, all that is ‘V
is that sinott the right to the .::i$*–
decided by the Civil c«f1«t’1V’]ies'”;:1r the
possession of the title of the
property. The p1jc3¢§I1–t xii’):-: purpose of
retaining the; decisic:-11 to be
re11der&;i by mndefifig 3
finding t)i1i;s.Afae:t, mutation t311t:rics axisting

at present.

,4 ” Sdfl
” _____ Judge