.. «. Aged 50 years,
._ 1 _
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 30"' DAY OF NOVEMBER. 2019
BEFORE
THE I-ION'BLE MRJUSTICE B.S. PA1fIfii."' ' '- " '
W.P.Nos.35167~192/2019 (KLR--.REGj' , '
BE'I"W'EEN: A A h
1. Smt.Narayar1amma,
W/0 Venkataramanachari,
Aged 48 years,
2. Sri. D.Muniraju, VA
S/0 Doddarnuniyappa, ._ .
Aged 45 years, _ '
3. Sri
S/0 Doddaihtinijfappa,«__--...__ '
Aged 50 years. A' '
4. Sri M1_.1niyae1iari,_'V 'V
S / 0 Shankaracha1'ie',d A'
Aged 45 years,' ' '
5. Sri Sriniva'sa._1:V2eddy,
S / Verxkatappa, . V H
Bjgfegakateisdisappa,
'S/or'BYCh'apIi3¥
Aged 49 .yea1's,
Sri R".D_amodaran.
"Sr/.0 C.A. Ramakrishna,
Aged 50 years,
Smt.Radhamma.
' "W/0 Srinivasachari,
Aged 48 years,
d A 'Aged 41-5 years,
9. Smt.Ruckman1yam.ma,
W/0 Subran1ar11',
Aged 51 years,
10.811 H.Mun1yappa,
S/0 Huchappa,
Aged 55 years,
1 1.Sr1 Venkataswamy Reddy,
S / 0 Chinnaiah,
Aged 45 years,
12.Sri Rajanna,
8/ 0 Chlnnappa,
Aged 44 years,
13.Sr1 B.Ch0wdappa,
S / 0 Byehappa,
Aged 48 years,
14.Sri Munirajzr;
S/0 Gud1ban.dappda_, . '
Aged 45 years_;'*--. "
15.smt.r§agaffin::g_., .
W/0 Buddareddy}'~ M
Aged 54 years, ' '
16.Sri Ravi, W *
S/c§_Papaiah, "
5.7 V.VSrr1t
«W/o Anlcappa;
Aged 6,e3.ye4;;rs,
A ' ~ 2 _ A '1.8.Sri D..N_arayanaswamy,
, "S/.9 Ddddapilla Reddy.
" Aged 45 years,
A' 19fSri Anjanappa,
" S/0 Papaiah,
Aged 46 years,
20.Srnt.I-Ianumakka,
W/0 Chmappa,
Aged 53 years,
21.82': Krishnappa,
S / 0 iaie Chlnappa @ Voteppa,
Aged 53 years,
22.Sri Anjanaehari,
S/0 Chinappachari,
Aged 40 years,
23.Sr1 Narayanaswamy,
S / 0 late Ajjappa,
Aged 44 years,
24.811 Gang1reddy,
S / 0 Ramareddy,
Aged 60 years,
25.811 S.Sr1n1va_saehar1, _ . _
S/0 Seenaeh.;3,r1,ge~r' _ _ 4_ "
Aged 46 Y?Ea1'5¢'];..V " ' '
S/0 I5';-Mur1i1*eddyt',-» %
Aged 45-uyears; V '
26.811 13/: .Naraya:;_asWam*r,' '
All are res"1ude.rv1ts
Channigarayapura Village,
" V. - Kasabaslicbli, Mahir Taluk,
» ;1:;o1a.r.,:::sta::e~t. _ PETITIONERS
( By Adv.)
1 ,,ND,rr
" " State Of Karnataka,
_ uR_e'f1j.by its Secretary,
7.VRe*s7enue Department,
H FM.S.Bui1ding, Bangalore.
2. The Deputy Commissioner,
Kolar District, Kolar.
3. The Asst.Commissioner,
Kolar Sub--Division,
Kolar.
4. The President,
Land Grant Committee,
Malur, Kolar District.
5. The Tahasildar,
Ma1ur'I'a1uk,Ma1ur. 'R.EaE':;5:?01$Iti:):lt"t31\fCl'fis'-.i'.V V
{By Sri R.0mkumar, ASA)
These Writ petitionsare filed Artic1es..226 and 227
of the Constitution of Ind--i,a"ppra§/ing. tozdirect the 41" respondent
to consider the representation ‘ofjfthe petitioner in accordance
with law, vide Ar1nexures–D1_”to_l323._arid»etcfi; –.
These “for.:Pre1iminary Hearing
this day, the §Co1J.r_t ‘made t.h.e__ “i’o11oWin_g:7_ »
‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
1. Learned AtdtditionaiGovemnient Advocate takes notice for
respondents. 4_ ”
:,_Athe..r.ri’1atter a short compass, the same is taken
t””t1ip”for’fi1’i–aidisposal with the consent of the learned counsel for
the ‘parties.’ ‘ ‘i._
writ petitions are filed by the petitioners
ti by the inaction on the part of the respondent-
anthorities in not considering the representations made by them
No.53 seeking regularisation of the unauthorised
s 5 4;;
occupation of Government lands in terms of Section 94A of the
Karnataka Land Revenue Act.
4. The case of the petitioners is that
application in Form No.53 as contemplated under__jR;ile
of the Karnataka Land Revenue .,r<a1es;. p_1t366.« fV"?_hey*–7i'1aV'e b
produced the copies of the said app1i.caL,ions
Tahsildar collectively vide Anne;:_uresmDl to have
also produced endorsements "by the "Office of the
Tahsildar collectively vide to evidence the
receipt of the applications in Form No.53.
5. Learnecl co’un’s’el~V._for–.:–1r1é*.petitioners submits that as the
petitioners havefhfiledgs.Vthevllapplicatlions by complying with the
requirement of plaw.__tii.eauthorities were not justified in failing to
take any. decision on thelsame.
wéidditional Government Advocate submits that
the €l_ommiti;ee .i’o.r:~’regularisation of unauthorised occupation of
l Gove’r_r_1me»nt.vlAl~ands is formed in Malur Taluk and if the
‘ énpetitioneirsthave presented their applications in accordance with
p:.ti1e’~re.nquired procedure, the same will be placed before the
VA Vfilvornmittee and appropriate decision in accordance with law will
i A” ifiaken.
_. 6 W
7. in the light of the submission made by the learned
Additional Government Advocate, these writ petitions are
disposed of issuing a direction to the Tahsildar, Malurfiaiulc ~–
respondent No.5 herein to scrutinise the app1ication.s”‘*an’d’.’piece
it before the Land Grant Committee formed forhtihe
consideration Within a period of thre:’e’Arn’o11th’sp “the da’teH’of
receipt of a copy of this order and theA:Corn_rriittee’vsha11 taiee
decision in the matter within a ‘fv..1r’L=her period,o_”f_. three”rnonths’
thereafter.
8. Learned Additional’Gofieirnrnpent is permitted to
fiie memo of
Ed/-3
HEDGE
A. …..