High Court Kerala High Court

Smt.Nirmala Rajan vs Nattakam Grama Panchayath on 11 August, 2010

Kerala High Court
Smt.Nirmala Rajan vs Nattakam Grama Panchayath on 11 August, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24582 of 2010(W)


1. SMT.NIRMALA RAJAN, W/O.RAJAN VARGHESE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. NATTAKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.TOM K.THOMAS

                For Respondent  :SRI.C.S.SUNIL

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :11/08/2010

 O R D E R
                  T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
                    -------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C)No.24582 of 2010
              -----------------------------------------------------
        DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 2010

                               JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner challenging

Exhibit P2 communication issued by the Panchayat directing to

stop the construction and demolish illegal constructions.

2. The petitioner is the Director of an Educational

Society. The Society constructed a building for starting an

Engineering College. It appears that there was a complaint

before the learned Ombudsman for Local Self Government

Institutions, wherein Exhibit P1 order was passed. Therein the

Panchayat was directed to verify whether any illegal construction

has been found and if so issue notice to the counter petitioner

therein, who is the husband of the petitioner herein and after

considering the reply the final orders have been passed.

3. Evidently, Exhibit P2 has been passed, according to

the petitioner, without issuing notice to the petitioner and without

conducting a hearing also.

4. The learned counsel for the Panchayat submitted that

the Panchayat is prepared to reconsider the matter after

W.P.(C)No.24582/10 -2-

considering the objections of the petitioner also.

5. Therefore, Exhibit P2 will be treated as a notice. The

petitioner will file objections within a period of two weeks and

thereafter the petitioner or her representative as well as the

complainant before the learned Ombudsman will be heard by the

respondent and appropriate final orders shall be passed as

expeditiously as possible.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.

dsn